2007
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2007.897142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand-Assembled Cable Bundle Modeling for Crosstalk and Common-Mode Radiation Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it is difficult to generate the PDF curves in most uncertainty analysis methods, such as MCM and gPC [1], [2], [6], since the uncertainty analysis results are inevitably in the form of an enormous amount of points. Although curve fitting can be used to simplify the problem, considering the complexity, it is impractical to do curve fitting at every single point.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysis Results In Emc Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, it is difficult to generate the PDF curves in most uncertainty analysis methods, such as MCM and gPC [1], [2], [6], since the uncertainty analysis results are inevitably in the form of an enormous amount of points. Although curve fitting can be used to simplify the problem, considering the complexity, it is impractical to do curve fitting at every single point.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysis Results In Emc Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the input parameters of simulation are no longer deterministic, but must be modeled by random variables with properly assigned distributions. However, conventional EMC simulation methods are not capable of dealing with such random inputs; consequently, many uncertainty analysis methods have been presented in recent studies [1], [2] in order to analyze the effects of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also divided the non-uniform random bundles into n-cascaded segments of a uniform multiconductor transmission line to deal with the random disturbance of the wire positions along hand-assembled Figure 7. Standard deviation of NEXT: analytical versus numerical results cable bundles [16]. At each section, all wire positions obeyed a Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental method is straightforward, but takes much time and costs a lot. Afterward, the random lines or cables were always modeled first by using the Monte Carlo (MC) method, where the nonuniform transmission lines were generally modeled as n-cascaded segments of a uniform multiconductor transmission line, then the transmission line theory was adopted to compute the terminal voltages of each sample, and statistical values were obtained from the numerical results [3][4][5][6][7]. This method needs large repeated computations and the results are only suitable for the case studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%