2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.29.21254538
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Half Year Longitudinal Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-antibodies and Rule Compliance in German Hospital Employees

Abstract: Introduction COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, is an occupational health risk especially for healthcare employees. This study was designed to determine the longitudinal seroprevalence of specific immunglobolin-G (IgG)-antibodies in employees in a hospital setting. Methods All employees including healthcare and non-healthcare workers in a secondary care hospital were invited to participate in this single-center study. After an initial screening, a 6 months follow-up was done which included serological examinatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All hospital employees were invited to participate during the first phase of the pandemic, so that the longitudinal trial began in April 2020. During that phase, a longitudinal evaluation of seroprevalence and PCR-positivity was performed followed by a half-year seroprevalence evaluation in October 2020 [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All hospital employees were invited to participate during the first phase of the pandemic, so that the longitudinal trial began in April 2020. During that phase, a longitudinal evaluation of seroprevalence and PCR-positivity was performed followed by a half-year seroprevalence evaluation in October 2020 [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the study cohort presented here, smoking, increased age and BMI have previously been shown to have a negative impact in studies involving two doses of BNT162b2 [28] or 9 months after vaccination, respectively [2]. This could not be seen in the results presented here (Table 3).…”
Section: Factors Causing a Reduced Immune Responsementioning
confidence: 48%