Hair Cortisol, Perceived Stress, and the Effect of Group Dynamics: A Longitudinal Study of Young Men during Compulsory Military Training in Lithuania

Abstract

Previous research shows a nonlinear dependency between hair cortisol concentrations and perceived stress levels. This may be due to stress being targeted at the individual level despite it also being a social phenomenon which is often affected by group dynamics. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the influence of perceived stress on the hair cortisol level, considering the impact of the variables of group dynamics (interpersonal, task, and norm cohesion). Information was collected on 11 groups of, in total, 112 young men in three phases of time during their compulsory military training (covering nine months in total). The classification and regression tree (C&RT) method was used to predict hair cortisol concentrations in groups. The results show that the variability of the hair cortisol level in young men groups can be explained by perceived stress only when the groups were in formation process (47.7% normalised importance in Model 1) and when the groups were working on their final tasks (37.80% normalised importance in Model 3); meanwhile, the importance of perceived stress in explaining hair cortisol concentrations is low when the group is in a routine period of a group life-span (28.9% normalised importance in Model 2). Interpersonal cohesion (normalised importance 100% in Model 1 and 80.0% in Model 3) and task cohesion (normalised importance 78.6% in Model 2) were the most important predictors in the study area. These results point to the importance of the elements of group dynamics when it comes to explaining the nature of hair cortisol as accumulated stress biomarkers in young men.

Proceedings of the International Defense and Homeland Security Simulation Workshop

“…The results of our study confirmed the insights of previous studies -that is, the military organizational dimension (C), which, according to a literature review, can be defined as a military unit-level, can affect soldiers' resilience and has the greatest impact on development of the active-duty soldiers' individual resilience by C1 -a positive command climate (Castro, 2007;Campbell D., Campbell K., & Ness, 2008;Paton, 2006;Smaliukiene et al, 2022) C2 -teamwork (Jue et al, 2020;Bekesiene et al, 2022), and C3 -cohesion (Lambić et al, 2018;Salo, 2008;Jue et al, 2020;Bekesiene et al, 2022;Smaliukiene et al, 2022). According to the development of psychological resilience, specific unit-level factors of military organization have a significant bearing on other aspects of resilience promotion resources.…”

“…Jue et al, 2020;Bekesiene et al, 2022;Smaliukiene et al, 2021;Cohesion (C3) Capability of a unit to carry out joint tasks; sticking together, keeping a pledge to each other, and being committed to the mission. Lambić , 2018;Salo, 2008;Jue et al, 2020;Bekesiene et al, 2022;Smaliukiene et al, 2022;…”

Impact of personality on cadet academic and military performance within mediating role of self-efficacy

“…According to social cognitive theories ( Bandura, 1997 ) academic self-concept and self-efficacy can play a significant role in determining one’s motivation, perseverance, and resilience ( Djourova et al, 2020 ; Bekesiene et al, 2022 ; Kanapeckaitė et al, 2022 ; Bekesiene et al, 2023 ). As military professionals often encounter high-stress situations that require quick decision making and effective problem-solving ( Myrseth et al, 2018 ; Smaliukiene et al, 2022 ), the strong self-efficacy helps them manage stress by improving their belief in their ability to cope with and overcome challenges. This, in turn, can reduce anxiety, increase focus, and improve decision-making under pressure.…”

Meaning in military service among reservists: Measuring the effect of prosocial motivation in a moderated-mediation model

“…It should be noted that research reveals a significant effect of socio-moral contexts in military organizations, ranging from highly motivating such as cohesion and esprit de corps ( Gal and Mangelsdorff, 1991 ) to undermining ones related to trauma, threats to personal safety violence ( van Voorhees et al, 2018 ). Studies show that camaraderie and mutual support make military service a subjectively meaningful activity ( Roth, 2021 ; Smaliukienė et al, 2022 ).…”