Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
A brief history of physical anthropology in Southern Africa is presented. Beginning with early accounts of settlers and visitors, detailed consideration of early and subsequent fossil discoveries and the individuals involved is given. A discussion of studies on the living peoples of Southern Africa follows and includes a historical summary of research on the interrelationships among Khoisan and Negro peoples, race, growth, nutrition, and secular trends.The roots of physical anthropology in Southern Africa are nearly as old as the recording of history on these shores. From the earliest times, visitors and settlers were wont to record their impressions of the diverse indigenous peoples of these African subtropics. Their rudimentary observations provide a corpus of what we may call the protohistory of physical anthropology in Southern Africa: a review of this phase provides the first section of this essay and it will take the story up to 1877; 1877 may be recognized as the year of the birth of anthropology as a scientific discipline in Southern Africa. Subsequent to that landmark, the major events of the past century under the rubrics of various subdivisions of physical anthropology will be considered. A map of Southern Africa showing the locations of several of the major historical and paleoanthropological sites mentioned in the review is given in Figure 1. THE PROTOHISTORY OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY (BEFORE 1877)Prior to 1877, most recorded data on the living peoples of the subcontinent were to be found in the annals of travelers, missionaries, and explorers. Some of the records go back to the Moslem geographers and merchants of the 10th to 14th centuries, who ventured down the east coast of Africa, well south of the equator, reaching at least 20°S, a t Sofala (later Nova Sofala in Mozambique). W. Hammond-Tooke (1908) reviewed some of the earlier contributions to anthropological work in his presidential address to Section F of the South African Association for the Advancement of Science in 1908. The writings of the very early Moslem travelers speak of two African peoples living along the East African littoral. There were the black Zenj or Zinj', who are thought to be progenitors of some of the Bantu-speaking peoples of southeast Africa and the yellow-skinned, click-speaking Waqwaq (or Wakwak), who were manifestly Khoisan peoples, although whether they were Khoikhoi (formerly known as Hottentots), San (previously Bushmen), or some other Khoisan group is not certain. The Zenj were encountered as far south as Sofala from the tenth century to the beginning of the sixteenth century. It would be wrong to infer from these writings of the earlier chroniclers that clickusing Bantu-speakers, such as the Zulu and Xhosa, were at that time no farther south than Sofala. Indeed, the latter view, as expressed for instance in W. HammondTooke's (1908) address and by George McCall Theal (19191, must be considered entirely false in the light of later historical and especially archeological research. The growth of knowledge in ...
A brief history of physical anthropology in Southern Africa is presented. Beginning with early accounts of settlers and visitors, detailed consideration of early and subsequent fossil discoveries and the individuals involved is given. A discussion of studies on the living peoples of Southern Africa follows and includes a historical summary of research on the interrelationships among Khoisan and Negro peoples, race, growth, nutrition, and secular trends.The roots of physical anthropology in Southern Africa are nearly as old as the recording of history on these shores. From the earliest times, visitors and settlers were wont to record their impressions of the diverse indigenous peoples of these African subtropics. Their rudimentary observations provide a corpus of what we may call the protohistory of physical anthropology in Southern Africa: a review of this phase provides the first section of this essay and it will take the story up to 1877; 1877 may be recognized as the year of the birth of anthropology as a scientific discipline in Southern Africa. Subsequent to that landmark, the major events of the past century under the rubrics of various subdivisions of physical anthropology will be considered. A map of Southern Africa showing the locations of several of the major historical and paleoanthropological sites mentioned in the review is given in Figure 1. THE PROTOHISTORY OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY (BEFORE 1877)Prior to 1877, most recorded data on the living peoples of the subcontinent were to be found in the annals of travelers, missionaries, and explorers. Some of the records go back to the Moslem geographers and merchants of the 10th to 14th centuries, who ventured down the east coast of Africa, well south of the equator, reaching at least 20°S, a t Sofala (later Nova Sofala in Mozambique). W. Hammond-Tooke (1908) reviewed some of the earlier contributions to anthropological work in his presidential address to Section F of the South African Association for the Advancement of Science in 1908. The writings of the very early Moslem travelers speak of two African peoples living along the East African littoral. There were the black Zenj or Zinj', who are thought to be progenitors of some of the Bantu-speaking peoples of southeast Africa and the yellow-skinned, click-speaking Waqwaq (or Wakwak), who were manifestly Khoisan peoples, although whether they were Khoikhoi (formerly known as Hottentots), San (previously Bushmen), or some other Khoisan group is not certain. The Zenj were encountered as far south as Sofala from the tenth century to the beginning of the sixteenth century. It would be wrong to infer from these writings of the earlier chroniclers that clickusing Bantu-speakers, such as the Zulu and Xhosa, were at that time no farther south than Sofala. Indeed, the latter view, as expressed for instance in W. HammondTooke's (1908) address and by George McCall Theal (19191, must be considered entirely false in the light of later historical and especially archeological research. The growth of knowledge in ...
Southern African Bantu-speaking negroid and San populations were examined with regard to the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) PvuII restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) showing alleles of 4 kb and 1.6 kb, called Type 1 and Type 2, respectively. The standardized disequilibrium coefficient for the electrophoretic G6PD types and PvuII alleles in the Southern African population was 0.28. The molecular lesion causing the GdA mutation is the same in the San and Southern African negroid populations. GdA chromosomes are found in association with both the Type 1 and Type 2 alleles, whereas none of the 62 GdB chromosomes from the Southern African populations had the Type 2 allele. Five of the 44 GdB chromosomes studied in the American Black population had the Type 2 allele, indicating that the GdB allele in the two populations may have different origins. The presence of all 3 A- deficiency mutations in the G6PD A gene, in a region where the ancestral population was thought to have predominantly G6PD B, may be explained by their origin in Africa after the divergence of the races.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.