Neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to replacement Factor-VIII impair the effective management of hemophilia-A1. Individuals with hemophilia-A due to major F8 gene disruptions lack antigenically cross-reactive material in their plasma (CRM-negative) and prevalence of inhibitors is >60%. Conversely, subjects with missense mutations are CRM-positive and the prevalence of inhibitors is <10%2. Individuals with the intron-22-inversion (~50% of individuals with severe hemophilia-A) should be in the former group based on the genetic defect. Although these individuals are CRM-negative, only 20% of them develop inhibitors3. Here we demonstrate the presence of comparable levels of F8 mRNA and intracellular Factor-VIII protein in B-lymphoblastoid cells and liver biopsies from healthy controls and subjects with the intron-22-inversion. These results support the hypothesis that most individuals with the intron-22-inversion are tolerized to Factor-VIII and thus do not develop inhibitors. Furthermore we developed a pharmacogenetic algorithm that permits the stratification of inhibitor risk for sub-populations by predicting immunogenicity using, as input, the number of putative T-cell epitopes in the infused FVIII and the competence of MHC-Class-II molecules to present such epitopes. The algorithm exhibited significant accuracy in predicting inhibitors in 25 unrelated individuals with the intron-22-inversion (AUC = 0.890; P = 0.001).
Summary. Background: BAY 86-6150 is a new human recombinant factor VIIa variant developed for high procoagulant activity and longer action in people with hemophilia with inhibitors. Objectives: To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BAY 86-6150 in non-bleeding hemophilia subjects. Methods: The study included non-bleeding men (18-65 years of age) with moderate or severe hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors. Sixteen subjects were randomized 3 : 1 to four cohorts of escalating doses of BAY 86-6150 (6.5, 20, 50 or 90 lg kg )1 [n = 3 per cohort]) or placebo (n = 1 per cohort);an independent data-monitoring committee reviewed previous cohort data before the next dose escalation. Blood sampling was performed predose and postdose; subjects were monitored for 50 days postdose. Results: At the tested doses, BAY 86-6150 was not associated with clinically significant adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. BAY 86-6150 pharmacokinetics exhibited a linear dose response, with a half-life of 5-7 h. Subjects demonstrated consistent, dose-dependent thrombin generation ex vivo in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) (mean peak effect, 26-237 nM thrombin from 6.5 to 90 lg kg). Peak thrombin levels over time paralleled BAY 86-6150, with thrombin kinetics appearing to be slightly shorter; thus, circulating BAY 86-6150 retained activity. There were corresponding decreases in activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin times. No subject developed de novo anti-BAY 86-6150 neutralizing antibodies during the 50-day follow-up. Conclusions: In this first-in-human, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study, BAY 86-6150 was tolerated at the highest dose (90 lg kg )1 ), with no safety concerns. Safety and efficacy will be further evaluated in phase II/III studies.
For decades the default treatment for anaemia and bleeding was mostly blood transfusion. However, safety risks from new and re-emerging pathogens in the blood pool, [1-3] significant inter-and intrahospital transfusion variability for matched patients, [4-9] the high cost of transfusion therapy, [10,11] and in particular the large number of risk-adjusted observational studies demonstrating that transfusion This open-access article is distributed under Creative Commons licence CC-BY-NC 4.0.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.