1994
DOI: 10.1109/78.285664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadamard transforms on multiply/add architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the 4-point Walsh-Hadamard transform can be computed by 7 addition and 3 one-bit shift operations (two operations to calculate z 0 , one for z 1 , and four for y 0 , y 1 , y 2 , y 3 , and three one-bit shift operations) [7]. Step 1.…”
Section: Fast Hadamard Transform On Shift/add Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…So, the 4-point Walsh-Hadamard transform can be computed by 7 addition and 3 one-bit shift operations (two operations to calculate z 0 , one for z 1 , and four for y 0 , y 1 , y 2 , y 3 , and three one-bit shift operations) [7]. Step 1.…”
Section: Fast Hadamard Transform On Shift/add Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall that an N = 2 k -point fast Hadamard transform algorithm with shift operation has the complexity [7] C(N ) = 7k2 k−3 , k is even, (7k + 1)2 k−3 , k is odd, C s (N ) = 3k2 k−3 , k is even, 3(k − 1)2 k−3 , k is odd,…”
Section: Complexity Of the General Algorithm With Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of them operate either in the transform domain [16], the pixel values are transformed into another domain by applying appropriate transform like OCT [1], [7], [8], OFT [9] ,DHT [13], [14], [15] and DWT [10], [11] and embedding technique done by modifying these coefficients, or in the spatial domain [12], [16], provides algorithm that directly operate on the pixel values of the host image such as the Least Significant Bit (LSB) substitution [17], Information bit hiding in spatial domain for JPEG image is described in [18]. But it was seen that the spatial domain watermarks are weaker than the frequency domain [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%