Habitat Structure and Regulation of Local Species Diversity in a Stony, Upland Stream

Abstract

Habitat structure may regulate species diversity at local scales, with complex habitats being normally associated with greater species richness than simple ones. We employed a new method of quantifying habitat structure to examine community structure in a stone-dwelling community of mobile macroinvertebrates inhabiting a perennial, upland stream (the Steavenson River) in southeastern Australia. We distinguished between the effects of increasing habitat structure by adding similar physical elements (habitat complexity) from that produced by adding qualitatively different sources of habitat structure (habitat heterogeneity) at spatial scales relevant to the biota. We used a field experiment to ask: (1) Does variation in habitat structure at local scales (i.e., between individual stones) result in variation in species richness (S) and numbers of individuals (N), and if so, are changes in S wrought passively by changes in N, or is there evidence of local regulation of S? (2) Are macroalgae, which are a source of habitat structure for invertebrates, also affected by stone surface structure? (3) What are the effects of habitat structure on faunal composition and body sizes?We used clay bricks as substrata and manipulated three sources of habitat structure in a crossed design: large surface pits and cracks (low density/high density); small pits caused by variation in surface texture (rough/smooth); and the abundance of macroalgae (begun with algae, begun without algae). The bricks were sampled for both fauna and epilithon on days 14 and 28 of colonization, when species richness and densities of individuals were comparable to natural stream stones.Habitat structure altered faunal diversity and abundances, with the majority of common species reaching higher abundances on creviced or rough surfaces. Rough surfaces were additionally associated with shifts in overall faunal composition and markedly smaller body sizes. Each element of habitat structure (large crevices, roughness, and macroalgae) promoted both increased species richness and densities of individuals.Rarefaction indicated that changes in S were disproportionate to changes in N, which suggests that S is regulated by local processes. Overall species richness was highest on day 14 with no difference in S between simple and complex surfaces. By day 28, simple surfaces had lost taxa relative to complex surfaces, suggesting that species richness in this stream community is regulated at a local scale, even though faunal composition changes continually and is contingent upon habitat structure.Habitat structure also affected the epilithon, suggesting that sources of habitat complexity and heterogeneity are interwoven in this system. Furthermore, the epilithon response to surface structure depended on the spatial scale of habitat complexity, with more of the red, filamentous alga Audouinella hermannii being found on rough surfaces than on smooth surfaces, but less on bricks with large crevices than without. These different responses to surface structure at different spati...

Ecological impact of Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) activity on macroinvertebrate communities in Lithuanian trout streams

“…Ecological theory argues that taxonomic richness increases with habitat heterogeneity. This assertion can be supported by studies that examined multiple taxa, scales, and ecosystems [34][35][36]. Crooks [37] extended this concept to ecosystem engineers, positing that the influence of ecosystem engineering on species richness should be related to whether or not the engineer increases or decreases habitat diversity, which in turn is dependent on the context in relation to the surrounding landscape.…”

Effect of substrate stability and canopy cover on stream invertebrate communities

“…Baskets were embedded into the streambed on 10 January 2000 with their tops level with the surrounding substrate and all baskets were left for 6 weeks. This is a similar length of time to previous experiments using artificial substrates (Downes et al 1998). Ten baskets were placed in pairs under a frame measuring 6 x 1.3 x 1.3 m covered with black polythene plastic to exclude light (Fig.…”

Nature and Functions of Cover for Riverine Fish.

“…In streams of all sizes, the abundance and diversity of invertebrates, a major source of food for many fishes, are strongly correlated to the degree of structural complexity of habitats (macrophyte beds, substratum or wood crevices) (O'CONNOR, 1991;DOUGLAS and LAKE, 1994;COGERINO et al, 1995;DOWNES et al, 1998). In lowland sand-bottom streams, woody debris support invertebrate production that is among the highest in lotic systems (SMOCK et al, 1989).…”