2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-018-2546-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat-dependent effects of personality on survival and reproduction in red squirrels

Abstract: Variation in intrinsic (body mass, reproductive condition) and extrinsic factors (habitat quality, spatiotemporal variation in food availability) can affect the costs and benefits of personality traits. Relationships between personality and fitness components can vary with changes in population density and/or habitat quality. Here, using capture-mark-recapture data of individually marked Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris), we explored whether indices of boldness and exploration are correlated with local… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the differential success of fast and slow exploring great tits (Parus major) across breeding seasons depending upon habitat resource quality 10 . A similar pattern of changing costs and benefits of boldness dependent upon spatio-temporal changes in resources was also found in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris 42 ). Such processes represent potential solutions to the conundrum of the maintenance of inter-individual variation in natural populations through differential costs and benefits dependent upon either spatial or temporal variation in environment 4 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For example, the differential success of fast and slow exploring great tits (Parus major) across breeding seasons depending upon habitat resource quality 10 . A similar pattern of changing costs and benefits of boldness dependent upon spatio-temporal changes in resources was also found in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris 42 ). Such processes represent potential solutions to the conundrum of the maintenance of inter-individual variation in natural populations through differential costs and benefits dependent upon either spatial or temporal variation in environment 4 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Parus major major wild (Quinn et al 2009) Parus major major wild (Kain & McCoy 2016) Physella acuta lab (Hulthén et al 2017) Rutilus rutilus caspicus wild (Santicchia et al 2018) Sciurus vulgaris orientis wild (Morales et al 2013) Sitophilus zeamais lab 20 (Shackleton et al 2005) Teleogryllus commodus lab (Monceau et al 2017) Tenebrio molitor lab (Boulton et al 2018) Xiphophorus Table 3. Heterogeneity estimates (I ) with the associated standard deviation (in brackets) for the global meta-analytic model.…”
Section: Aknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in natural populations based on capture–mark–recapture of animals can rely on the sampling method itself to obtain measure of individual behaviour and/or personality. Indeed, individual differences in willingness to enter a baited trap (trappability) can be considered as a measure of an animal's propensity for risk‐taking (Bisi et al., 2011; Boon et al., 2008; Boyer et al., 2010; Le Coeur et al., 2015; Montiglio et al., 2012; Réale et al., 2000; Santicchia, Gagnaison, et al., 2018; Santicchia et al., 2019). Reactions to risky situations, excluding any component of novelty which is exclusively related to exploration propensity (Réale et al., 2007), have been identified in literature as a measure of individual boldness (Réale et al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%