2019
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0640-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat degradation and indiscriminate hunting differentially impact faunal communities in the Southeast Asian tropical biodiversity hotspot

Abstract: Habitat degradation and hunting have caused the widespread loss of larger vertebrate species (defaunation) from tropical biodiversity hotspots. However, these defaunation drivers impact vertebrate biodiversity in different ways and, therefore, require different conservation interventions. We conducted landscape-scale camera-trap surveys across six study sites in Southeast Asia to assess how moderate degradation and intensive, indiscriminate hunting differentially impact tropical terrestrial mammals and birds. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the largely homogenous landscape-scale forest structure and habitat in our study sites, the low predicted species richness is likely indicative of a community that has undergone severe hunting-driven defaunation. The extent of faunal impoverishment is further supported by the fact that we failed to record almost half of the mammal community would be expected to occur in these sites based on historical distribution maps (Tilker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the largely homogenous landscape-scale forest structure and habitat in our study sites, the low predicted species richness is likely indicative of a community that has undergone severe hunting-driven defaunation. The extent of faunal impoverishment is further supported by the fact that we failed to record almost half of the mammal community would be expected to occur in these sites based on historical distribution maps (Tilker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In many ways, our study landscape exemplifies classical “empty forest syndrome” (Redford, ). All large‐ and medium‐sized predators (with the exception of Asiatic black bear), as well as all megaherbivores, appear to be locally extirpated (Tilker et al, ). Large ungulates have been hunted out from most of the landscape (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one seizure incident alone, as recently as October 2019, over 800 wildlife parts were found in Sarawak, of which 183 were bear gall bladders (Ling 2019). This is also reflected elsewhere in Southeast Asia, where indiscriminate and illegal use of snares is decimating vertebrates across the region, including bears (Harrison et al 2016b, Gray et al 2018, Symes et al 2018, Tilker et al 2019. In Cambodia, seizure rates involving bears have reportedly decreased in recent years and this is thought to be due to declining bear populations, in addition to trade becoming more discreet (Crudge et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, human footprint indices did not correlate well with faunal intactness (Supplementary Figure 1), because while threats such as habitat loss may correlate well, several major threats to faunal intactness (e.g., hunting, invasive species) are not properly accounted for by the human footprint maps (Benítez-López et al, 2019;Belote et al, 2020). There is considerable geographic variation in patterns of hunting pressure, but many tropical forest regions characterized by relatively low human densities and land cover change have also suffered from extensive and unsustainable hunting pressure (Redford, 1992;Tilker et al, 2019); invasive predators have encroached into wilderness areas far from infrastructure networks (Doherty et al, 2016); and diseases such as ebola can spread deep into remote forests (Rizkalla et al, 2007). None of these threats are picked up by remote sensing tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%