Habitat configuration affects spatial pattern of β diversity of insect communities breeding in oyster mushrooms

Abstract

Abstract. Theory predicts that spatial structure can mediate interactions that affect species diversity in a patchy environment. A rarely considered effect of spatial structure on biodiversity is the interplay of spatial habitat arrangement with species interactions at multiple spatial scales. We investigated how spatial habitat arrangement and predation mediate the assembly of the larval communities of fungivorous insects breeding in the oyster mushroom, Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) P.Kumm in a North American woodland. In a two-way factorial design, we varied the spatial arrangement of mushroom clumps ('clustered', 'patchy', and 'uniform'; 3 levels) crossed with predator exclusion (access allowed or not; 2 levels) to study their joint effects on patterns of a, b and c diversity of the fungivorous insect communities. Partitioning diversity into these three components suggested that neither spatial nor predation treatments significantly affected a, b and c diversity. We found that an intermediate inter-clump distance (i.e., the 'patchy' treatment) increased spatial autocorrelation in insect community composition within experimental blocks, particularly in the mushrooms to which predators had access. The spatial structuring in b diversity indicates that the arrangement of mushroom clumps can structure b diversity of fungivorous larval communities through direct effects on the species themselves (e.g., increased aggregation and habitat choice of ovipositing females of fungivorous insects), as well as effects mediated through the presence and behavior of predators (e.g., spatially structured selective foraging by predators acting as a filter on which species were in the clumps). The naturally patchy nature of mushroom fruiting may transform the spatial pattern of b diversity by altering the behavior of ovipositing females, or by weakening the negative effect of larval competition.

Explanation of beta diversity in European alpine grasslands changes with scale

“…Instead, most examinations of environmental difference and geographic distance have done so at a single scale (e.g., Fluck et al, 2020; Stehn & Roland, 2018) or compared regions (e.g., Bahram et al, 2013; Qian & Ricklefs, 2007). Those that did address distance gradients took an indirect approach by changing the grain of analysis (Keil et al, 2012, for multiple taxa across Europe; Kadowaki & Inouye, 2015, in an experimental fungivorous community; Batista et al, 2021, for Atlantic Forest bats). More directly, Cáceres et al (2014), using Mantel correlograms, reported that distance decay was most important at middle distances for birds and mammals in southwestern Brazil.…”

Planktonic diatom assemblage seasonal diversity used to assess environmental health in a coastal wetland of southern Chile

“…The use of alpha and beta diversities to determine productivity and ecosystem health has been useful and transversal, given that studies have been conducted both in terrestrial (Harrison et al 2006) and aquatic (Langenheder et al 2012, Bini et al 2014 ecosystems, studying different biological groups. This include benthic macroinvertebrates (Heino et al 2013), phytoplankton (Mousing et al 2016), macrophytes (Thomaz et al 2003), terrestrial insects (Kadowaki & Inouye 2015) and vertebrates (Martin & Ferrer 2015). Our study based on diatom assemblages was useful to infer the ecosystem's environmental health.…”

Habitat quality and edge area of fragments determine insect diversity in a heavily used landscape: Implications for forest landscape restoration

“…For example, flower abundance as habitat quality and habitat area have positive effects on the species richness of hoverflies and bees (Kleijn & Langevelde, 2006). Furthermore, the distribution of insect communities across the fragmented landscapes exhibits spatially correlated patterns due to habitat features such as vegetation cover that is also spatially correlated (Kadowaki & Inouye, 2015;Procheş et al, 2010). The spatial dependence in insect communities is the result of species responses to spatially correlated habitat features (Borcard et al, 1992(Borcard et al, , 2004.…”