2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-010-0386-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat associations of wild goat in central Iran: implications for conservation

Abstract: Wild goat (Capra aegagrus) is one of the highly valued but threatened ungulates of Iran. Seasonal habitat use of wild goat was studied from October 2006 to September 2008 in Haftad Gholleh Protected Area, central Iran. We developed averaged logistic regression models based on Akaike Information Criterion weights for each season. The obtained habitat suitability models showed high sensitivity (greater than 88%) for all evaluation datasets. Wild goat habitat use was positively related with steep slopes, areas ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread use by Asiatic cheetahs of the rugged parts of the predominantly flat central plateau of Iran is coherent with the relatively low habitat selectivity of cheetahs compared to other carnivores (Durant et al, 2010), and may reflect in Iran a shift in prey selection. Because cheetahs prefer prey within a body mass range of 23-56 kg (Hayward, Hofmeyr, O'brien, & Kerley, 2006), thus with the decline of Jebeer and goitered gazelles, the wild sheep and Persian ibex, two mid-sized species inhabiting rough areas (Esfandabad, Karami, Hemami, Riazi, & Sadough, 2010), have emerged as the most available wild prey species for cheetahs in Iran (Farhadinia & Hemami, 2010). This possibly resulted in cheetahs increasingly using rough habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread use by Asiatic cheetahs of the rugged parts of the predominantly flat central plateau of Iran is coherent with the relatively low habitat selectivity of cheetahs compared to other carnivores (Durant et al, 2010), and may reflect in Iran a shift in prey selection. Because cheetahs prefer prey within a body mass range of 23-56 kg (Hayward, Hofmeyr, O'brien, & Kerley, 2006), thus with the decline of Jebeer and goitered gazelles, the wild sheep and Persian ibex, two mid-sized species inhabiting rough areas (Esfandabad, Karami, Hemami, Riazi, & Sadough, 2010), have emerged as the most available wild prey species for cheetahs in Iran (Farhadinia & Hemami, 2010). This possibly resulted in cheetahs increasingly using rough habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More topographically rich areas in the country harbour large populations of two vulnerable mountain ungulates (Valdez, 2008; Weinberg et al., 2008), the wild sheep ( Ovis spp) and wild goat ( Capra aegagrus ) for which Iran encompasses major portions of their global populations. These three ungulates used to be largely distributed across the country; however, habitat degradation and poaching caused their populations to suffer from substantial reductions in distribution and population size (Bashari & Hemami, 2013; Esfandabad, Karami, Hemami, Riazi, & Sadough, 2010; Hemami & Groves, 2001). Currently, the majority of these ungulate populations live within protected areas, specifically those in central part of the country (Ansari, 2016; Esfandabad et al., 2010; Hemami & Groves, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three ungulates used to be largely distributed across the country; however, habitat degradation and poaching caused their populations to suffer from substantial reductions in distribution and population size (Bashari & Hemami, 2013; Esfandabad, Karami, Hemami, Riazi, & Sadough, 2010; Hemami & Groves, 2001). Currently, the majority of these ungulate populations live within protected areas, specifically those in central part of the country (Ansari, 2016; Esfandabad et al., 2010; Hemami & Groves, 2001). Central Iran has a large network of protected areas (PAs) and no‐hunting areas (NHAs) with high potential to protect habitats and populations of the ungulates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six of these species are threatened globally (IUCN, 2016; note synonymy of urial and mouflon on the Red List and the new classification of Rezaei et al, 2010). Apart from the Persian fallow deer, which lives in semi-captive conditions, and the wild boar, the consumption of which is prohibited on religious grounds, all other ungulate species are threatened by poaching and have declined since the 1970s (Karami et al, 2002; Tatin et al, 2003; Kiabi et al, 2004; Shams Esfandabad et al, 2010; Ghoddousi et al, 2016a; Soofi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%