SummaryThe UK Influenza Pandemic Contingency Plan does not consider the impact of a pandemic on critical care services. We modelled the demand for critical care beds in England with software developed by the Centers for Disease Control (FLUSURGE 1.0), using a range of attack rates and pandemic durations. Using inputs that have been employed in UK Department of Health scenarios (25% attack rate and 8-week pandemic duration) resulted in a demand for ventilatory support that exceeded 200% of present capacity. Demand remained unsustainably high even when more favourable scenarios were considered. Current critical care bed capacity in England would be unable to cope with the increased demand provided by an influenza pandemic. Appropriate contingency planning is essential. There is general agreement regarding the increasing threat of a fresh influenza epidemic [1]. Despite public health measures, an epidemic will result in an increased number of admissions, both to hospitals and to intensive care units (ICUs). The recent Influenza Pandemic Plan from the UK Department of Health [1] addresses many aspects of an influenza pandemic, but provides no estimate of the likely impact on critical care services. We have tried to quantify the probable demands on critical care services in a UK setting by modelling the requirement for intensive care admission to ICUs in England, using a software program (FLUSURGE 1.0) developed at the Centers for Disease Control in the USA [2].
MethodsWe used FLUSURGE 1.0 [2] to calculate the impact of an influenza pandemic in England on hospital admission, occupancy of all ICU beds, and of Level 3 beds (i.e. those with facilities for mechanical ventilation). Data on population (49.97 million) and age distribution [3], acute hospital beds (109 846) [4], and intensive care bed numbers (1787) [5] were obtained from publicly available sources. We initially modelled demand based on an 8-week epidemic and a 25% attack rate, but also assessed the sensitivity of our estimates to variations in these figures. Simulations were also constructed using the assumptions that either half or all of the high dependency (or Level 2) beds (1426) [5] could be upgraded to Level 3 intensive care beds in the event of a pandemic. The age distribution bins in UK data [3] meant that we had to use the population under 19 years to provide figures for the lowest population bin in FLUSURGE 1.0 (less than 16 years) [2]. All other inputs were available without modification. We also considered the impact of neuraminidase inhibitors, which may reduce disease duration by approximately 1-2 days [6]. Their impact on disease severity is less clear, but the incidence of hospitalisation and complications requiring antibiotic therapy may be reduced by 50% [6].
ResultsThe simulation with an 8-week epidemic and 25% attack rate resulted in a peak weekly hospital admission rate of 35,738, and a peak daily hospital admission rate Anaesthesia, 2005, 60, pages 952-954