2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H1N1 pandemic influenza impact on hand hygiene and specific precautions compliance among healthcare workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 In 2011, after the 2009 H1N1 influenza epidemic, a multimodal hand hygiene study was carried out at the Children's Hospital, National Medical Center Siglo XXI of the Mexican Institute of Social Security: the prevalence of hand washing was 51 %, and 38.9 % did it at all five recommended moments (p < 0.05). 16 Adherence to hand washing in this study was higher than in previous reports at the same institution, which is a finding similar to that reported by Labarca et al, 7 who found higher adherence during the H1N1 influenza pandemic, in comparison with a previous period and a period after it. Although no cause was found for this effect, it can be attributed to the intense educational campaigns regarding prevention and the fear of contagion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…15 In 2011, after the 2009 H1N1 influenza epidemic, a multimodal hand hygiene study was carried out at the Children's Hospital, National Medical Center Siglo XXI of the Mexican Institute of Social Security: the prevalence of hand washing was 51 %, and 38.9 % did it at all five recommended moments (p < 0.05). 16 Adherence to hand washing in this study was higher than in previous reports at the same institution, which is a finding similar to that reported by Labarca et al, 7 who found higher adherence during the H1N1 influenza pandemic, in comparison with a previous period and a period after it. Although no cause was found for this effect, it can be attributed to the intense educational campaigns regarding prevention and the fear of contagion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hand hygiene Fraction of virus remaining on hands after hand hygiene 0.05 (18,19) 40% (16,(20)(21)(22) Eye protection Fraction of virus that bypasses the goggles or face shield 0.04 (23) 50% Facemask Fraction of sprayed and contact-transferred virus that penetrates or bypasses facemask 0.10 b (24,25) 50% b (16,17,(25)(26)(27) Percent reduction in frequency of contact with the facial portals 90% (28) N95 filtering facepiece respirator Fraction of sprayed and contact-transferred virus that penetrates through respirator 0.05 b 20% b (16,17,(25)(26)(27) Protection factor d Uniform: range 5-10 (29,30) Percent reduction in frequency of contact with the facial portals 90% (28) Isolation Fraction reduction in the duration of occupational exposure 0.18 (7) 80% (31)(32)(33)(34) Percent increase in compliance with hand hygiene, eye protection, facemasks or respirators, and full compliance with gloves 25% (7,32,35,36) Surface decontamination Fraction of virus remaining on surfaces 0.05 (37,38) 50% e The protection factor is a ratio of the concentration of particles outside the respirator to that inside. The assigned protection factor of these respirators is 10 (30) , but lower performance was considered due to issues with long-term fit and use practices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 En 2011, después de la epidemia de influenza H1N1 en 2009, se llevó a cabo un estudio multimodal de higiene de manos en el Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social: la prevalencia del lavado de manos fue de 51 % y 38.9 % lo hizo en los cinco momentos recomendados (p < 0.05). 16 El apego al lavado de manos en este estudio fue superior al de reportes previos en esa misma institución, hallazgo similar al encontrado por Labarca et al, 7 quienes encontraron un apego mayor durante la pandemia por influenza H1N1, en comparación a un periodo anterior y posterior a esta. Aunque no se encontró una causa de este efecto, se puede atribuir a las intensas campañas de educación en cuanto a prevención y al temor de contagiarse.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified