2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10307.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H i content in galaxies in loose groups

Abstract: Gas deficiency in cluster spirals is well known and ram‐pressure stripping is considered the main gas removal mechanism. In some compact groups too gas deficiency is reported. However, gas deficiency in loose groups is not yet well established. Lower dispersion of the member velocities and the lower density of the intragroup medium in small loose groups favour tidal stripping as the main gas removal process in them. Recent releases of data from the H i Parkes All‐Sky Survey (HIPASS) and catalogues of nearby lo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15. An indication that some (presumably enriched) gas has been removed from our group galaxies by other means than SN outflows is provided by the factor of 2–3 deficiency in H i mass derived for the spirals in NGC 5044 and NGC 7619 compared to field spirals of similar optical morphology and size (Sengupta & Balasubramanyam 2006). In addition, evidence for ongoing or past stripping associated with galaxy–ICM interactions is present in a few of our groups (Rasmussen, Ponman & Mulchaey 2006; Mendel et al 2009).…”
Section: Origin and Fate Of Icm Metals In Groupsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…15. An indication that some (presumably enriched) gas has been removed from our group galaxies by other means than SN outflows is provided by the factor of 2–3 deficiency in H i mass derived for the spirals in NGC 5044 and NGC 7619 compared to field spirals of similar optical morphology and size (Sengupta & Balasubramanyam 2006). In addition, evidence for ongoing or past stripping associated with galaxy–ICM interactions is present in a few of our groups (Rasmussen, Ponman & Mulchaey 2006; Mendel et al 2009).…”
Section: Origin and Fate Of Icm Metals In Groupsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While there is evidence that rampressure stripping has produced H i deficiencies in galaxy groups with X-ray emitting IGM (e.g. Davis et al 1997;Sengupta & Balasubramanyam 2006), several studies concur that for galaxies with M * similar to NGC 90 (whether in galaxy groups or galaxy clusters), large offsets of their highest density H i beyond optical disk cannot be attributed to ram pressure alone (Bravo-Alfaro et al 2000;Chung et al 2009;Scott et al 2010). Still, we also note that the extent of the NGC 90 H i disk (assuming it is traced by the low-velocity H i component) is similar to that of its optical disk.…”
Section: Intra-group Medium and Ram Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology appears undistorted although there is evidence of multiple arms. IC 1933 is classified as "Sd" by Sengupta & Balasubramanyam (2006). The galaxy in both UV bands appears flocculent without a clear spiral arm structure.…”
Section: Uv Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%