2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15244.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and abundance profiles of hot gas in galaxy groups - II. Implications for feedback and ICM enrichment

Abstract: We investigate the history of galactic feedback and chemical enrichment within a sample of 15 X‐ray bright groups of galaxies, on the basis of the inferred Fe and Si distributions in the hot gas and the associated metal masses produced by core‐collapse and Type Ia supernovae (SNe). Most of these cool‐core groups show a central Fe and Si excess, which can be explained by prolonged enrichment by SN Ia and stellar winds in the central early‐type galaxy alone, but with tentative evidence for additional processes c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
99
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(254 reference statements)
18
99
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This observed difference in metallicity follows the trend of higher metal abundances in the central regions of higher temperature groups (e.g. Rasmussen & Ponman 2009 for the SW and the NE groups, respectively. Although this is not a significant difference, these results are consistent with the galaxy redshifts z = 0.0218 for UGC 4051 in the SW group and z = 0.0236 and 0.0228 for UGC 4052 E and W, respectively (Crawford et al 1999).…”
Section: Spatially Resolved Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This observed difference in metallicity follows the trend of higher metal abundances in the central regions of higher temperature groups (e.g. Rasmussen & Ponman 2009 for the SW and the NE groups, respectively. Although this is not a significant difference, these results are consistent with the galaxy redshifts z = 0.0218 for UGC 4051 in the SW group and z = 0.0236 and 0.0228 for UGC 4052 E and W, respectively (Crawford et al 1999).…”
Section: Spatially Resolved Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The origin of such a difference of ICM enrichment between cooler and hotter objects is still unclear, and has been already debated in the literature (e.g. Rasmussen & Ponman 2009;Liang et al 2016;Yates et al 2017). For example, in contrast to clusters, galaxy groups may not be closed boxes (e.g.…”
Section: Enrichment In Clusters and Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback can be seen operating in many of them. Most X-ray luminous groups have cool cores with short central radiative cooling times (< 1 Gyr) and low central entropy (Rasmussen & Ponman 2009;Sun et al 2009). A full range of bubbling behaviour is seen in these objects (see e.g.…”
Section: Hot Gas In Groups and Elliptical Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%