2011 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccis.2011.6070336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gyroscopic stabilization of a kid-size bicycle

Abstract: This paper reports the design and development of a self-balancing bicycle using off the shelf electronics. A selfbalancing bicycle is a non-linear unstable system similar to that of an inverted pendulum. Experimental results show the robustness and efficiency of a proportional plus derivative (PD) controller balancing the bicycle. The system uses a control moment gyroscope (CMG) as an actuator for balancing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This controller may also be relevant for a growing number of terrestrial balancing applications such as unstable vehicles including scooters (e.g. C-1 electric scooter, Lit Motors, USA), bicycles [27], unicycles [28], other personal transportation devices (e.g. the EMBRIO, Bombardier, Canada, and the eniCycle, eniCycle, Slovenia), single-wheel robots [29], and underwater vehicles [30], in addition to micro satellites and space manipulators [31], [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This controller may also be relevant for a growing number of terrestrial balancing applications such as unstable vehicles including scooters (e.g. C-1 electric scooter, Lit Motors, USA), bicycles [27], unicycles [28], other personal transportation devices (e.g. the EMBRIO, Bombardier, Canada, and the eniCycle, eniCycle, Slovenia), single-wheel robots [29], and underwater vehicles [30], in addition to micro satellites and space manipulators [31], [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Controlling balance by controlling the steering angle or using centrifugal force as in the research of Tanaka and Murakami [1], Chen and Dao [2][3][4], Huang et al [5], Vatanashevanopakorn Parnichkun [6], and Wang et al [7] (ii) Controlling balance by changing the center of mass such as Lee and Ham [8], Keo et al [9], and Yamakita et al [10] (iii) Controlling balance by flywheel as in the studies of Suebsomran [11], Sikander and Prasad [12], Beznos et al [13], Hwang et al [14], Karnopp [15], Gallaspy [16], Xu et al [17], Lam [18,19], Lot and Fleming [20], Park and Yi [21], Stephen and Girard [22], Lee et al [23], Suprapto [24], and Kim et al [25] e control method using centrifugal force has the disadvantage of not being able to control bicycle balance when the bicycle is stationary. e control method by changing the center of mass requires more weight, increasing the bicycle weight, while the response time of the system is slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lowcost hardware platform was developed and the closed-loop PID controllers were designed to maintain the balance of the TWSB vehicle [4]. Authors in [5] designed a double closedloop PD controller to stabilize the tilt angle of the TWSB vehicle model, but the classical input-output feedback cannot eliminate the influence of the coupling term, and cannot effectively control the precession angle back to zero. A fuzzy PID algorithm was designed to realize the self-balancing of a TWSB vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%