2015
DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2015.5.3.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gynecomastia induced by H1-antihistamine (ebastine) in a patient with idiopathic anaphylaxis

Abstract: H1-antihistamine is generally a well-tolerated and safe drug. However, in resemblance with all other drugs, H1-antihistamines can also prompt adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We recently encountered the very unusual ADR of H1-antihistamine-induced gynecomastia. A 21-year-old man with idiopathic anaphylaxis was treated with ebastine (Ebastel), a second-generation H1-antihistamine, for the prevention of anaphylaxis. Three months later, the patient remained well without anaphylaxis, but had newly developed gynecoma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, for daily practice allergists, it is still very difficult to diagnose and aware some rare agents that caused anaphylaxis, such as intravenous tacolimus and cyclosporine [ 16 ], and gynecomastia caused by H1-antihistamine (ebastine) [ 17 ] in the case reported from Korea. Using basophil activation test for in vitro diagnosis of chlorpheniramine-induced anaphylaxis was discussed by Lee et al [ 18 ] in this issue may provide some insights and future resolution in the diagnosis of life-threaten clinical condition of anaphylaxis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, for daily practice allergists, it is still very difficult to diagnose and aware some rare agents that caused anaphylaxis, such as intravenous tacolimus and cyclosporine [ 16 ], and gynecomastia caused by H1-antihistamine (ebastine) [ 17 ] in the case reported from Korea. Using basophil activation test for in vitro diagnosis of chlorpheniramine-induced anaphylaxis was discussed by Lee et al [ 18 ] in this issue may provide some insights and future resolution in the diagnosis of life-threaten clinical condition of anaphylaxis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%