Gydytojų Psichosocialiniai Darbo Aplinkos Veiksniai Ir Jų Sąsajos Su Gyvenimo Kokybe

Žutautienė, Rasa; Radišauskas, Ričardas; Ustinavičienė, Rūta; Kirvaitienė, Jolita; Rakutytė, Kornelija

doi:10.35988/sm-hs.2019.057

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(14 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This group also indicated a lack of managerial feedback. In line with the literature, the findings confirm that public sector doctors' work is busier and more stressful than other occupation groups' work, and this may lead to burnout and mental health problems [20][21][22][23]. For example, the Clinician Well-Being Collaborative provides a possible "antidote" to that by publishing materials and providing online information focused on leadership engagement, workload and workflow, resilience or constructive coping strategies, and work-life balance [24,25].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Diagnosis of Psychosocial Risk Determinants and the Prioritization of Organizational Intervention Objects among Medical Occupational Groups in a Public Healthcare Institution

Dudutienė

Račkauskienė

Stukas

2021

The 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: As the work environment is one of the most significant sources of stress, employers in the European Union are obliged to identify psychosocial risk determinants and take preventive measures to improve workers’ health and well-being while at work. The aim of this study was to determine which medical occupational group is the most exposed to stress and where any differences lie among medical occupational groups regarding the perception of psychosocial risk determinants and organizational intervention objects in the Lithuanian public healthcare institution. Materials and Methods: Using a cross-sectional study design, paper questionnaires were delivered to all health workers (n = 690) of the Lithuanian public healthcare institution; the response rate was 68% (n = 467). The questionnaire consisting of three parts was completed for the survey. It covered 14 psychosocial risk determinants and work-related stress, 10 organizational intervention objects, and sociodemographic data of health workers. Results: The results showed that perceived stress had mean rank scores differing statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) across occupational groups. The highest stress rating was given by the doctors’ group. Regarding psychosocial risk determinants, there were statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05) in work overload scores among doctors, heads of units, and other health workers; in overtime scores and in tight deadlines scores between doctors and other health workers; in unclear role scores among all medical occupational groups; in being under-skilled for job scores between nurses and doctors; in responsibility for decision making scores among heads of units, doctors, and other health workers. Concerning organizational intervention objects, there were statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05) in work-life balance scores, ensuring skills/abilities matching to the job demands scores, social support scores, organizational support scores, participation in decision-making scores, justice of reward scores, manager feedback scores, variety of tasks scores among heads of units, doctors, nurses, other health workers. Conclusions: The results of the study confirmed that different occupational groups emphasized different psychosocial risk determinants and organizational intervention objects. The findings suggest that focusing on the average worker does not have practical value and that it is important to understand the differential effects of different job characteristics on work outcomes considering occupational status while developing coping strategies in the institution. The risk group with the most exposure to stress were doctors in the healthcare institution.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Diagnosis of Psychosocial Risk Determinants and the Prioritization of Organizational Intervention Objects among Medical Occupational Groups in a Public Healthcare Institution

Dudutienė

Račkauskienė

Stukas

2021

The 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Norint įmonėje užkirsti kelią priekabiavimui ir darbuotojų užgauliojimui, būtina laiku imtis išankstinių veiksmų. Valstybinė darbo inspekcija ragina darbdavius įmonėse, įstaigose, organizacijose diegti psichologinio smurto atpažinimo ir įveikos priemones [15].…”

Section: Rezultatų Aptarimasunclassified

Psichologinis Smurtas Darbe Informacinių Technologijų Sektoriuje

Rakalovič¹,

Stanislavovienė²

2023

Health Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psichologinio smurto darbe tema jau keletą dešimtmečių gvildenama tiek užsienio, tiek Lietuvos literatūroje. 2022 metų lapkričio 1 d. Lietuvoje įsigaliojo Darbo kodekso pakeitimai, pagal kuriuos didesnės įmonės privalo patvirtinti smurto ir priekabiavimo prevencijos politiką, ją paskelbti darbuotojams ir įgyvendinti. Informacinių technologijų sektorius yra vienas greičiausiai augančių visame pasaulyje, tačiau smurto paplitimo reiškiniai tarp šio sektoriaus darbuotojų Lietuvoje nebuvo nagrinėti. Šiuo tyrimu siekėme įvertinti psichologinio smurto darbe paplitimą tarp IT specialistų ir jo sąsajas su subjektyviuoju sveikatos vertinimu ir darbingumu. Tyrimo priemonė − anoniminė anketa, sniego gniūžtės metodu išplatinta tarp IT specialistų. Į anketos klausimus atsakė 114 respondentų. Rezultatai parodė, jog 10,5 proc. tyrimo dalyvių darbe dažnai ar sistemingai patiria psichologinį smurtą. Kiek didesnė tyrimo dalyvių dalis pažymėjo, kad jiems dažnai ar sistemingai tenka patirti psichologinio smurto apraiškas. 27 proc. respondentų nurodė, kad darbe dažnai patyrė sarkazmą ar kitą erzinantį elgesį, o ketvirtadaliui respondentų buvo liepiama atlikti žemesnės kvalifikacijos darbą. Daugiau kaip 19 proc. respondentų nurodė, kad darbo vietoje buvo apkalbami, 18,4 proc. respondentų patyrė užgaulias pastabas dėl savo įpročių, pažiūrų ir asmeninio gyvenimo, beveik 11 proc. respondentų teko patirti žodinį priekabiavimą ar grasinimus, apie 10 proc. respondentų darbo vietoje buvo ignoruojami. Nustatyta, kad psichologinio smurto patyrimas darbo vietoje gali būti susijęs su prastesniu sveikatos bei darbingumo vertinimu.

show abstract

Gydytojų Psichosocialiniai Darbo Aplinkos Veiksniai Ir Jų Sąsajos Su Gyvenimo Kokybe

Cited by 2 publications

References 13 publications

Diagnosis of Psychosocial Risk Determinants and the Prioritization of Organizational Intervention Objects among Medical Occupational Groups in a Public Healthcare Institution

Diagnosis of Psychosocial Risk Determinants and the Prioritization of Organizational Intervention Objects among Medical Occupational Groups in a Public Healthcare Institution

Psichologinis Smurtas Darbe Informacinių Technologijų Sektoriuje

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About