2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gut microbiome differences among Mexican Americans with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus

Abstract: Purpose Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an urgent public health problem and disproportionately affects Mexican Americans. The gut microbiome contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetes; however, no studies have examined this association in Mexican-Americans. The objective of this study was to compare gut microbiome composition between Mexican-Americans with and without T2DM. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of volunteers from San Antonio, TX. Subjects were 18 years or older and self-identified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 Microbial taxa, including Prevotella, Coprococcus, Ruminococus, Akkermansia, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Eubacterium, Clostridium, Bacteroides, Streptococcus, Propionibacterium, Lactobacillus, and Fusobacterium are primarily responsible for these metabolites. 3,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]56 Unfortunately, our investigations revealed that most of these microbial communities were reduced in patients with T2DM. In healthy patients, while SCFAs directly serve as energy sources to intestinal mucosal cells, they can be circulated systematically, providing a vital host energy source and acting in signal transduction.…”
Section: Influence Of Scfa On Gut Microbiome Dynamics Between T2dm Pa...mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…59 Microbial taxa, including Prevotella, Coprococcus, Ruminococus, Akkermansia, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Eubacterium, Clostridium, Bacteroides, Streptococcus, Propionibacterium, Lactobacillus, and Fusobacterium are primarily responsible for these metabolites. 3,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]56 Unfortunately, our investigations revealed that most of these microbial communities were reduced in patients with T2DM. In healthy patients, while SCFAs directly serve as energy sources to intestinal mucosal cells, they can be circulated systematically, providing a vital host energy source and acting in signal transduction.…”
Section: Influence Of Scfa On Gut Microbiome Dynamics Between T2dm Pa...mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Additionally, we observed that Fusobacteria and Verrucomicrobia were two minor but important phyla. 3,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] On the basis of phylum distribution, however, patients with/without T2DM exhibited conflicting microbiota findings, including increased opportunistic pathogens and decreased butyrateproducing microbes (Table 1). While we observed a rise in Lactobacillus, Akkermansia was reduced in T2DM patients but significantly high in pre-diabetic patients.…”
Section: Gut Microbiota Dynamics In T2dm and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works reported that the alpha diversity of gut microbiota was lower in patients with T2DM and prediabetes ( Lambeth et al., 2015 ; Li et al., 2020 ). However, alpha diversity was not significantly different in patients with T2DM and without diabetes in a study conducted in Mexican Americans ( Kitten et al., 2021 ). Another study showed a decreased alpha diversity in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, but not in those with prediabetes, when compared with those without diabetes ( Gaike et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Technologies such as 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing have enabled the study of the composition of GI microbiome and variations of this composition among individual host organisms. ,, α- (within sample) and β- and γ-diversity (between two samples) metrics reflect similarities and/or differences in the “core” microbial composition of the GI habitat in health and disease contexts. Microbial diversity exploration in CNS disorders has also begun. A few pioneering studies began investigating the impact of GIM on neurochemistry, where changes in the microbiota led to changes in behavior and neurochemical mediators in animal models. Heijtz et al demonstrated that early life microbiota exposure (within the first 6 weeks) had life-long behavioral and brain developmental impact.…”
Section: Routes Of Gut–brain Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%