2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73383-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gully Erosion Modeling Using GIS-Based Data Mining Techniques in Northern Iran: A Comparison Between Boosted Regression Tree and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has many benefits over recursive tree construction techniques such as classification and regression tree (CART) [51]. Furthermore, it is unbiased in selecting splitting rules and does not use an exhaustive variable search routine [52]. By using an unbiased variable selection method in modeling, QUEST has negligible bias [53].…”
Section: Quick Unbiased Efficient Statistical Tree (Quest)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has many benefits over recursive tree construction techniques such as classification and regression tree (CART) [51]. Furthermore, it is unbiased in selecting splitting rules and does not use an exhaustive variable search routine [52]. By using an unbiased variable selection method in modeling, QUEST has negligible bias [53].…”
Section: Quick Unbiased Efficient Statistical Tree (Quest)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil erosion in the form of gully erosion is a serious global problem, and it continues to pose a threat to soil and water resources, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran [ 2 , 3 ]. Among the several types of water-induced erosion, gully erosion is a more intense form of soil erosion [ 4 ] and is one of the most complex geomorphic phenomena on the Earth’s surface [ 5 ]. Such erosional activities also change the shape of the Earth’s landform and produce a rugged topography, which is not suitable for production activities, construction of communication networks, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the widely used statistical methods to predict GES mapping are frequency ratio [ 7 ], logistic regression [ 18 ], weight of evidence (WoE) [ 19 ], index of entropy (IoE) [ 5 ], etc. Besides statistical methods, different ML algorithms have also been widely used to predict GES mapping such as artificial neural network (ANN) [ 20 ], support vector machine (SVM) [ 20 ], random forest (RF) (Hosseinalizadeh et al 2019), multi-layer perception (MLPC) approaches [ 21 ], classification and regression tree (CART) [ 22 ], boosted regression tree (BRT) [ 7 ], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [ 23 ], multi-variate adaptive regression spline (MARS) [ 5 ], and maximum entropy [ 24 ]. Ensemble models have also been widely used for their novelties and capabilities in the comprehensive analysis of GES mapping [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a suggestion for future research efforts in species distribution modeling [82][83][84]. In general, there are different data mining techniques that are applied in geosciences and environmental engineering in cases of landslides, forest fires, land subsidence, flood, and gully erosion, including random forest-RF [85][86][87][88][89][90], support vector machine-SVM [90][91][92], multivariate adaptive spline regression-MARS [93,94], and boosted regression tree-BRT [95]. Even in a case on groundwater modeling, Rahmati et al 2016 [69] considered a comparison between two data mining techniques, including random forest and Maxent models.…”
Section: Validation Of the Hsi Maps And Comparison Between Fr And Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%