2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines of the Paul-Ehrlich-Society of Chemotherapy, the German Respiratory Diseases Society, the German Infectious Diseases Society and of the Competence Network CAPNETZ for the Management of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and Community-acquired Pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
17
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, we found that younger patients more frequently received quinolones. This practice is not in line with European and German guidelines [24,25]. The reasons behind this attitude are unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Secondly, we found that younger patients more frequently received quinolones. This practice is not in line with European and German guidelines [24,25]. The reasons behind this attitude are unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In case 4, it is questionable if the Unyvero™-detected Chlamydia result was of any clinical significance, as pathogen detection was below the Unyvero™ Chlamydia threshold and sepsis was confirmed by autopsy. Moreover, a potential pneumonia caused by anaerobic germs or by the relative frequent CAP-causing fastidious pathogen Mycoplasma pneumonia [17] was not detected by the molecular prototype device, as these pathogens were not included in the panel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study intended to compare the established standard-of-care for pathogen and antibiotic resistance detection to the Unyvero™ prototype pneumonia application. It also intended to aid in the diagnosis of pneumonia by identifying genes of 17 [16] . Test results were compared to findings of conventional culture and AST.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der Nachweis einer Legionellenpneumonie gilt als gesichert, wenn mindestens eines der folgenden Kriterien erfüllt wurde [12,13] …”
Section: Mikrobiologische Diagnostikunclassified