2013
DOI: 10.1108/tr-09-2013-0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guests' perception of staged authenticity in a theme park: an example from Disney's Epcot's World Showcase

Abstract: Purpose – The study aimed to investigate the role of staged authenticity on guests' overall experience when visiting a theme park. It also assessed their evaluative perception of the “real experience” versus the “staged experience.” In addition, the study explored the variables that may predict guest's perceived level of authenticity, realism and truth when experiencing “reproduced” landmarks at a theme park. Design/methodology/approach – The study's setting was the World Showcase at Disney's Epcot theme … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constructive authenticity is relative, negotiable and context-bound, and is dependent on the single individual's subjective perception and interpretation of authenticity (Dicks, 2004) as well as collective meanings attached to place as a toured object (Belhassen et al, 2008). Even if a tourism product exhibits features that are clearly staged or contrived, tourists may still deem them authentic (Guttentag, 2010;Milman, 2013). Halewood and Hannam (2001) confirm that commercial use of technologies at heritage sites can turn into commercial success, which visitor numbers at 'Jorvik' shows -a Viking heritage centre in York.…”
Section: Authenticity and New Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructive authenticity is relative, negotiable and context-bound, and is dependent on the single individual's subjective perception and interpretation of authenticity (Dicks, 2004) as well as collective meanings attached to place as a toured object (Belhassen et al, 2008). Even if a tourism product exhibits features that are clearly staged or contrived, tourists may still deem them authentic (Guttentag, 2010;Milman, 2013). Halewood and Hannam (2001) confirm that commercial use of technologies at heritage sites can turn into commercial success, which visitor numbers at 'Jorvik' shows -a Viking heritage centre in York.…”
Section: Authenticity and New Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to understand the impact of authenticity on stakeholders' perceived experience (Milman, 2013) to develop a lasting authentic experience in the minds of the stakeholders. Through such a communication process, reputation and positioning collectively could influence stakeholders' perceptions based on an enriched awareness about the authenticity of claimed relevance of a brand to customers' needs, and authenticity of claimed differentiation of the brand to satisfy those needs, in comparison to the competitive brands.…”
Section: The Nexus Between Reputation Image and Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on such a relationship nurturing promotional campaign with the existing customer, Arsenal not only retains them, but also attracts new customers, where customer knowledge or orientation on benefit is favourably linked to relationship quality (Rajaobelina and Bergeron, 2009;Shams, 2011c). Simultaneously, RM helps to authenticate the advantages of carrying out businesses with a company through customer or other stakeholder's perceived experience (Shams, 2013b;Kurtz, 2009;Milman, 2013). Moreover, RM entrusts all staff members, as well as external stakeholders such as commercial partners to keep a keen eye on service quality and superior product development, as RM broadens the quality attentiveness not only in the marketing department, but also in all departments of a company (Stavros, 2005;Kurtz, 2009).…”
Section: Joint Power Innovative Offering and Relationship Factor Focmentioning
confidence: 99%