1979
DOI: 10.2307/2129785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gubernatorial Tools: Formal vs. Informal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both office and personal characteristics enter into any govemor's decision to veto iegisiation and the potential for overrkie. The formal veto power of a govemor is acknowledged by state legislators as a potent pdftical tool (Bernick, 1979). The strength of the formal grant to veto is an obvious starting point and has been incorporated in all previous studies.…”
Section: Qiaracteristics Of Govemors and Gubernatorial Oificementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both office and personal characteristics enter into any govemor's decision to veto iegisiation and the potential for overrkie. The formal veto power of a govemor is acknowledged by state legislators as a potent pdftical tool (Bernick, 1979). The strength of the formal grant to veto is an obvious starting point and has been incorporated in all previous studies.…”
Section: Qiaracteristics Of Govemors and Gubernatorial Oificementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of public opinion about a governor is clearest on election day, when voters are more likely to vote for popular governors (Kenney and Rice 1983;King 2001), but it is evident in other ways as well. As with the president, a governor's ability to achieve his or her policy objectives depends on a combination of formal and informal powers (Bernick 1979;Beyle 1999;Rosenthal 1990). A key element of a governor's informal powers is the public's assessment of his or her job performance (Beyle 1999), with a popular governor being more likely to achieve his or her policy goals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having examined the attftudinal dimension of the govemor's rde in economic deveiopment, the next section examines the relative power of govemors in the pdicy area. Examining gubematorial power has been a predominant theme in comparative state pdftics (e.g., Schiesinger, 1965;Dometrius, 1979;Bemick, 1979;Beyie, 1983;Meuller, 1985). Recently, Sigeiman and Dometrius (1988) reported that gubernatorial power over state agencies (using an index of influence deveioped by Abney and Lauth [1983] from survey responses of 778 state administrators across the fifty states) was related to a combination of formal powers granted through constitutions and statutes and informal pdftical resources determined by their electoral securfty and party control of the legisiature.…”
Section: Governors' Perceptions Of Their Role and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%