Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Cat. No. PR00158)
DOI: 10.1109/lics.1999.782585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guarded fixed point logic

Abstract: Guarded fixed point logics are obtained by adding least and greatest fixed points to the guarded fragments of firstorder logic that were recently introduced by Andréka, van Benthem and Németi. Guarded fixed point logics can also be viewed as the natural common extensions of the modal -calculus and the guarded fragments. We prove that the satisfiability problems for guarded fixed point logics are decidable and complete for deterministic double exponential time. For guarded fixed point sentences of bounded width… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
124
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ''modal'' nature of the guarded fragments is confirmed by the fact that they are decidable and have the finite model property. Moreover, their decidability is ''robust'', in the sense that it is inherited by their fixed-point extensions, as shown by Graedel and Walukiewicz [142]. As such, this line of research provided a clear conceptual answer to Vardi's question: it is exactly the locality or ''dynamicity'' of modal logic (shared with the above-mentioned fragments, in the form of guardedness) that is responsible for its robustly good behavior!…”
Section: Modalization As Dynamificationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The ''modal'' nature of the guarded fragments is confirmed by the fact that they are decidable and have the finite model property. Moreover, their decidability is ''robust'', in the sense that it is inherited by their fixed-point extensions, as shown by Graedel and Walukiewicz [142]. As such, this line of research provided a clear conceptual answer to Vardi's question: it is exactly the locality or ''dynamicity'' of modal logic (shared with the above-mentioned fragments, in the form of guardedness) that is responsible for its robustly good behavior!…”
Section: Modalization As Dynamificationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We here concentrate on special model properties and issues of expressive completeness. For background on the logics involved, modal logics (including many variants and extensions of basic modal logic ML, e.g., in the spirit of epistemic or temporal logics) and guarded logics like the guarded fragment of first-order logic GF, we refer the reader to textbook sources and surveys [8,10] and the original papers [2,11,14,12]. Theorem 2.1.…”
Section: Model-theoretic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Take the program P , the open answer set variant of the classical infinity axiom in guarded fixed point logic from [11]:…”
Section: Example 1 Take the Program P With Rules P(a) ← Not Q(a) Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], these external manipulations, i.e. not expressible in the language of programs itself, were compiled into fixed point logic (FPL) [11], i.e. into an extension of first-order logic with fixed point formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation