1996
DOI: 10.1049/ip-map:19960117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GTD solution with higher order terms to the diffraction by an edge: towards a uniform solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, when the evanescence angle does not vanish, they exhibit a jump discontinuity at the SBs, which must compensate the corresponding discontinuity in the evanescent GO field. When ψ = 0 (homogeneous incident plane wave), the extra diagonal terms are continouous at the SBs, as expected, but they are not smooth since they have to compensate a discontinuity in the derivative of the GO field [ Büyükdura , 1996].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, when the evanescence angle does not vanish, they exhibit a jump discontinuity at the SBs, which must compensate the corresponding discontinuity in the evanescent GO field. When ψ = 0 (homogeneous incident plane wave), the extra diagonal terms are continouous at the SBs, as expected, but they are not smooth since they have to compensate a discontinuity in the derivative of the GO field [ Büyükdura , 1996].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In order to provide suitable asymptotic expressions also for the ρ and ϕ components of the diffracted field, can be substituted into , as suggested by Büyükdura [1996]. It follows that: where the elements t ij of the 3 × 2 matrix T are given by with …”
Section: High‐frequency Asymptotic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here D s and D h are the UTD diffraction coefficients and the other terms are the higher order diffraction coefficients. It is noted that the above result is an exact solution for the diffraction for a half-plane [7].…”
Section: Derivation Of Dyadic Green's Function For a Wedge In Sphericmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The two versions of the TD-UTD slope diffraction coefficients indicate slightly different levels of accuracy, and both are valid when the incident wave is rapidly varying spatially in a direction perpendicular to the incident ray at the edge. Other slope diffracted fields [11,12] are not considered in this work. In Section 3, numerical results based on the two different versions of the TD-UTD slope diffracted fields are presented and compared with an exact TD solution for the special case of a straight wedge given previously by Felsen [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%