&gt;Intersectional knowledge as rural social innovation

Banerjee, Swati; Santos, Luciane Lucas dos; Hulgård, Lars

doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.007

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, this knowledge constitutes popular technologies of production -and should be properly recognised as such -not only because they shape innovative crop production methods at extremely high altitudes, but also because of the local wise elders' capacity of unveiling some biological markers, such as the fox howl change as a sign of the proximity of the sowing time. As is also the case of the SSE regarding its creative potential to forge popular technologies and solutions to deal with material constraints, indigenous and other popular knowledges have not been properly recognised as an innovation in themselves, regardless of their contribution to providing different looks and frameworks towards old challenges (Banerjee et al 2021).…”

Section: Some Key Aspects In the Indigenous Economiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Indigenous economies

Santos¹

2023

Encyclopedia of the Social and Solidarity Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Some Key Aspects In the Indigenous Economiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Indigenous economies

Santos¹

2023

Encyclopedia of the Social and Solidarity Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Addressing land rights for women should not be confused with the reform of customary ownership of land (with the replacement of freehold or individual title) being put forward by economists who see customary ownership as a critical barrier to economic growth (Hughes, 2004). Development literature in Melanesia is emphasising neoliberal discourses of growth, efficiency, reform and governance, whereas only a handful of publications from NGO's and researchers are challenging current economic and trade policy (Addinsall, Glencross, Rihai, et al, 2015; Addinsall, Glencross, Scherrer, et al, 2015; Addinsall, 2017; Anderson & Lee, 2010; Banerjee et al, 2021; Jolly, 2017; Lightfoot, 2005; Regenvanu, 2010; Simo, 2010; Underhill‐Sem et al, 2014). Crucially, these viewpoints fail to recognise the reality in Melanesia, where the vast majority of people reside in rural areas and have vibrant smallholder subsistence and cash‐cropping economies (Allen, 2008).…”

Section: Applying An Intersectional Lens To a Melanesian Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying an intersectional lens to addressing gender disparities and disadvantage in rural Melanesian agriculture

Addinsall

Rihai

Andre

et al. 2023

J of Intl Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agricultural research and development projects face structural barriers to the equitable participation of women. Applying an intersectional approach can facilitate women to freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development within the existing patriarchal and colonial structures, ultimately challenging and subverting these structures. This paper argues that development initiatives must seek to understand the ways of being within specific localised projects, to tailor support and mitigate disadvantage. Through an exploration of two female‐led agroforestry projects in Vanuatu and Fiji, this paper demonstrates how centring the sovereignty of women over their own experience and livelihood aspirations can lead to familial, community and regional wellbeing.

show abstract

“…The literature on social innovation has not specifically paid attention to rural social innovation. Banerjee et al ( 2021 ) argue that strategies and innovations grounded on local communities’ knowledge and rhythm within complex rural contexts are still underrepresented in the social innovation literature. Therefore, some definitions of rural social innovation are developed to better understand and guide further development in rural social innovation.…”

Section: Social Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding rural context in the social innovation knowledge structure and its sector implementations

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of social innovation is increasingly being discussed to pursue sustainable development. New terms and keywords are created to cope with new ideas in various contexts. How these terms are developed in the current structure of knowledge and how we can reinterpret the semantic networks with the empirical context are the primary motivation of this paper. The rural social innovation knowledge structure is constructed to understand the phenomena better and cope with future needs. A multi-methods methodology is applied to construct the knowledge structure with the primary method being topic modeling. The results from topic modeling, co-word analysis, and co-citation are combined to co-construct the knowledge structure. The narratives for the built knowledge structure are then developed in the context of rural social innovation to enhance our understanding. This study found three findings. First, the trend of keywords “community”, “governance”, and “rural” have increased significantly in the field of social innovation. Second, an investigation of the intensity of the topics found six dominant groups of topics, namely actor, business model, natural resources, food security, governance, and urban. Third, the co-word analysis shows that the word innovation is closely related to the terms: sustainable development, social entrepreneurship, social enterprise, rural community, electronic commerce, co-design, and social behavior. The mapping of key terms shows that the structure of the global social innovation research landscape is quite complex. However, it can be broken down into five main parts: objectives, inputs, transformations, outputs, and outcomes.

show abstract

>Intersectional knowledge as rural social innovation

Cited by 12 publications

References 17 publications

Indigenous economies

Indigenous economies

Applying an intersectional lens to addressing gender disparities and disadvantage in rural Melanesian agriculture

Understanding rural context in the social innovation knowledge structure and its sector implementations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About