2013
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2013.2238544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GSICS Inter-Calibration of Infrared Channels of Geostationary Imagers Using Metop/IASI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The seasonal fluctuations in the 3.8 µm channel differences are much more pronounced, reaching~+0.4K around the vernal equinox and somewhat smaller at the autumnal equinox; around the solstices the differences are close to zero [65]. MTSAT-2 is a three-axis stabilized satellite and there is evidence of larger errors about local midnight when the entrance aperture of the imager faces to the sun, and stray solar radiation appears to degrade the calibration of the MTSAT-2 infrared channels [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The seasonal fluctuations in the 3.8 µm channel differences are much more pronounced, reaching~+0.4K around the vernal equinox and somewhat smaller at the autumnal equinox; around the solstices the differences are close to zero [65]. MTSAT-2 is a three-axis stabilized satellite and there is evidence of larger errors about local midnight when the entrance aperture of the imager faces to the sun, and stray solar radiation appears to degrade the calibration of the MTSAT-2 infrared channels [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The reference sensors are the hyperspectral Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometers (IASI) on the European polar-orbiting MetOp satellites [64]. The high resolution spectral measurements of IASI are convolved with the relative spectral response functions of the channels on the satellites on the geostationary satellites to allow comparison between the measurements [65]. Inaccuracies in the calibration of the infrared measurements on both MTSAT-2 and Himawari-8 radiometers could lead to bias errors in the satellite-data as errors in the brightness temperatures propagate through the atmospheric correction algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the land, on the other hand, AHI TB shows negative bias with respect to the simulated RAOB TB for all channels. Introducing the method suggested by Hewison et al [16] to estimate the relationship between radiances from two different instruments (Equation (3)), two sets of fitting coefficients are obtained from the comparison results and applied to AHI radiance to remove, if any, systematic bias…”
Section: Satellite Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the uncertainty caused by impacts of atmospheric component variations and target surface BRDF, both instruments should view the geo-spatially collocated targets at similar viewing geometries within a short time interval. The following criteria are used to identify the collocated pairs without the match of viewing azimuth angles, similar to the collocation criteria applied to the GEO-LEO IR inter-calibration by the Global Satellite Inter-Calibration System (GSICS) community for the GEO-LEO IR inter-calibration [14,15].…”
Section: Geo-leo Collocationsmentioning
confidence: 99%