Growth, tolerance to low ­salinity, and osmoregulation in decapod crustacean larvae

Abstract

Marine invertebrate larvae suffer high mortality due to abiotic and biotic stress. In planktotrophic larvae, mortality may be minimised if growth rates are maximised. In estuaries and coastal habitats however, larval growth may be limited by salinity stress, which is a key factor selecting for particular physiological adaptations such as osmoregulation. These mechanisms may be energetically costly, leading to reductions in growth. Alternatively, the metabolic costs of osmoregulation may be offset by the capacity maintaining high growth at low salinities. Here we attempted identify general response patterns in larval growth at reduced salinities by comparing 12 species of decapod crustaceans with differing levels of tolerance to low salinity and differing osmoregulatory capability, from osmoconformers to strong osmoregulators. Larvae possessing tolerance to a wider range in salinity were only weakly affected by low salinity levels. Larvae with a narrower tolerance range, by contrast, generally showed reductions in growth at low salinity. The negative effect of low salinity on growth decreased with increasing osmoregulatory capacity. Therefore, the ability to osmoregulate allows for stable growth. In euryhaline larval decapods, the capacity to maintain high growth rates in physically variable environments such as estuaries appears thus to be largely unaffected by the energetic costs of osmoregulation.KEY WORDS: Biomass growth · Crustacean larvae · Physiological plasticity · Osmoregulation · Osmotic stress · SalinityResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher

Tolerance of disease‐vector mosquitoes to brackish water and their osmoregulatory ability

“…The vast majority of marine invertebrates are osmoconformers that maintain, for a limited range of fluctuating salinities, their internal osmotic pressure close to the osmotic pressure of the external medium through intracellular and/or extracellular organic osmolytes (Bradley , Torres et al. , Pallarés et al. ).…”

“…To survive in aquatic environments where salinity and thus osmotic pressure vary, aquatic arthropods have developed two main physiological strategies: osmoconformation and osmoregulation (Bradley 1987, Charmantier et al 2009). The vast majority of marine invertebrates are osmoconformers that maintain, for a limited range of fluctuating salinities, their internal osmotic pressure close to the osmotic pressure of the external medium through intracellular and/or extracellular organic osmolytes (Bradley 1987, Torres et al 2011, Pallar es et al 2015. Conversely, osmoregulators regulate their hemolymph osmolality mainly by active transport of ions via specialized organs (Bradley 1987, 2008, Beyenbach and Piermarini 2009, Evans and Claiborne 2009.…”

The Comparative Osmoregulatory Ability of Two Water Beetle Genera Whose Species Span the Fresh-Hypersaline Gradient in Inland Waters (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Hydrophilidae)

“…Osmoregulation has been widely studied in marine organisms (e.g. [ 6 – 10 ]), where the vast majority of taxa are osmoconformers [ 5 , 11 ]. In contrast, our knowledge of the osmotic mechanisms of organisms inhabiting inland waters is severely limited, despite the fact that information on the salinity tolerance of such taxa is essential for understanding their ecology and evolutionary history (e.g.…”

Exploring larval phenology as predictor for range expansion in an invasive species

“…A2), and because on average, our values of developmental time were similar to those found by Epifanio et al (). Larval rearing followed standard methods (Torres et al ; see also Supplementary material Appendix 2).…”