2010
DOI: 10.3722/cadaps.2010.777-786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Simulation of Facial/Head Model from Childhood to Adulthood

Abstract: This paper presents a method to simulate the growth of the facial/head model of a person from childhood to adulthood. The method works by generating continuous data of standard landmarks using auto-regressive moving average based on anthropometry of the head/face. The standard landmarks are assigned to the particular head and face, and vertices of the growing head/facial model are calculated by projecting the vertices to the one dimensional subspace that contains measurements of the landmarks. The vertices of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mode represents an overall increase in length of the face (and distance between the eyes) and a decrease in the distance between the endocanthion and pronasale. Broadly, one might interpret this as an elongation in facial shape, which is consistent with the growth of children [11]. Subtle differences are observed only between modes 1 at levels 1 (age) and 2 (all other variations) via mPCA, although we believe that these differences would become more apparent with increased number of landmark points.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This mode represents an overall increase in length of the face (and distance between the eyes) and a decrease in the distance between the endocanthion and pronasale. Broadly, one might interpret this as an elongation in facial shape, which is consistent with the growth of children [11]. Subtle differences are observed only between modes 1 at levels 1 (age) and 2 (all other variations) via mPCA, although we believe that these differences would become more apparent with increased number of landmark points.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Multivariate modelling techniques have also been used to analyse coordinate 6 data directly in order to understand age-related changes in facial size and shape. These methods have included: simple "centering" and / or averaging techniques of facial shape at each age followed by a simple parametric model of growth [45], multivariate or kernel regression [46,47], principal components analysis (PCA) based methods [48][49][50], clustering and discriminant function analysis [51], and autoregressive moving averaging methods [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much previous research relating to the process of facial changes in adolescents with respect to age (see, e.g., Refs. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][66][67][68][69][70]). In particular, a review of agerelated facial changes [40] points out the difficulty of predicting changes in specific subjects, noting, for example, that: "the adolescent growth spurt in the mandible occurs in less than 25% of the cases, but the presence, onset, duration, and magnitude of the pubertal growth spurt in facial dimensions cannot be accurately predicted for any single individual."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our objective was not only to thoroughly evaluate the facial morphology of patients with WBS, NS, and 22q11.2DS, but also to assess their development and model the trajectories of age‐related changes at defined ages within the age range of 3–18 years. Such analyses might prove useful for differentiating between phenotypically similar syndromes and thus facilitate exact diagnosis, and enable more accurate genotype–phenotype correlations (Hammond et al, ; Hammond & Suttie, ; Lin, Lai, & Cheng, ; Sforza et al, ; Tartaglia et al, ; Tassabehji, ; Yagi et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%