1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0809-9_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Response of Southern Pines to Acidic Precipitation and Ozone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pinus ponderosa trees of the San Bernardino mountains react similarly because the local ozone leads to retention of only one or two needle year classes in late summer, the usual time of needle shedding (Miller, 1993a, b). Premature needle shedding and foliar symptoms also occurred in long-term fumigation studies on shortleaf pine and related species (Flagler and Chappelka, 1995). Memory-type carry-over effects into the next year were also described but without diagnostics of early stress reactions in the year of treatment (Sasek and Flagler, 1995).…”
Section: **Memory++ Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pinus ponderosa trees of the San Bernardino mountains react similarly because the local ozone leads to retention of only one or two needle year classes in late summer, the usual time of needle shedding (Miller, 1993a, b). Premature needle shedding and foliar symptoms also occurred in long-term fumigation studies on shortleaf pine and related species (Flagler and Chappelka, 1995). Memory-type carry-over effects into the next year were also described but without diagnostics of early stress reactions in the year of treatment (Sasek and Flagler, 1995).…”
Section: **Memory++ Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Teskey (1995) reviewed the literature for southern pines and concluded that growth losses due to ozone at ambient levels are probably occurring, and that annual reductions in above-ground growth are small (2-5 %). These conclusions were based on findings with seedling or sapling studies (Flagler & Chappelka, 1995). Growth reductions for mature trees were 2-9 % per year, based on model predictions (Dougherty, Teskey & Jarvis, 1992 ;Webb, Burkhart & Amateis, 1992).…”
Section: Three Growing Seasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flagler et al (1992) used regression analysis to determine the effects of ozone and acidic deposition on growth of pines across the southern region of the USA. Data were combined from five open-top chamber studies (Flagler & Chappelka, 1995) and analysed for growth and biomass responses. Foliage biomass was the most ozone-responsive biological variable measured.…”
Section: Tree To Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mottles found in adjacent C ? 1 and older needles showed morphological traits similar to the so-called ''winter fleck'' injury (brownish dots with sharp edges; Hartmann et al 2007;Miller and Evans 1974;Stolte 1996), but which were also reminiscent of chlorotic mottling by O 3 stress (symptom frequency increasing with needle age and higher illumination on both abaxial and adaxial needle sides) as found in Pinus ponderosa and other conifers (Alvarez et al 1998a;Flagler and Chappelka 1995;Grulke 2003). With both symptoms adjacent to each other on the same branches, our results suggest that mottling in C and C ?…”
Section: Visible Injurymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Under ozone stress, conifer needles show visible injury in the form of homogeneous (Hartmann et al 2007) band-like (Flagler and Chappelka 1995;Miller and Evans 1974) needle discoloration or mottling (Sanz and Calatayud 2012;Stolte 1996) which vary in intensity and morphological details depending on the ozone dose and tree species. In pine species, chlorotic mottling is the most frequent injury reported and this symptom is one of the principal parameters used to calculate the Forest Pest Management (FPM) and Ozone Injury Index (OII) in forest health surveys in California and other parts of the US (Arbaugh et al 1998;Grulke 2003).…”
Section: Ozone Injury In Conifer Foliagementioning
confidence: 99%