2003
DOI: 10.1078/1618-8667-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth response of Ficus benjamina to limited soil volume and soil dilution in a skeletal soil container study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Pot size significantly altered the responses of A net , non-structural carbohydrates and total biomass to HNT and LNT. Small pots constrained below-ground growth along with more limitation on above-ground growth (Thomas and Strain, 1991; Loh et al, 2003; Climent et al, 2011), given that a skimpy supply of nutrients and water which might induce strong nutrient or water inhibition (Walters and Reich, 1989). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pot size significantly altered the responses of A net , non-structural carbohydrates and total biomass to HNT and LNT. Small pots constrained below-ground growth along with more limitation on above-ground growth (Thomas and Strain, 1991; Loh et al, 2003; Climent et al, 2011), given that a skimpy supply of nutrients and water which might induce strong nutrient or water inhibition (Walters and Reich, 1989). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, plants in larger pots achieved bigger root mass (McConnaughay and Bazzaz 1991;Bar-Tal et al 1995;Loh et al 2003). The effects of larger soil volumes on root mass were different than interplant interactions, as demonstrated in our experiment.…”
Section: Grain-mass (Grams)mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Hess and de Kroon (2007), however, hypothesized that root overproduction in the presence of another plant is consistent with effects due to the larger soil volume available to these plants than to plants growing alone. Earlier, McConnaughay and Bazzaz (1991) and Loh et al (2003), clearly showed that root mass is a function of the available rooting volume, independent of the available nutrients. However, some of the observed root overproduction could not be immediately explained solely based on volume of soil and nutrient availability (Hess and de Kroon 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ejemplo, las podas (de formación o de saneamiento) que no siempre se realizan correctamente; la forma y tamaño de las hojas, y el manejo por parte de los usuarios, en conjunto contribuyeron a las alteraciones en las formas naturales de las copas. Las plagas persistentes como el insecto chupador Stenomacra marginella Herrich-Schaeffer y enfermedades del follaje que promueven la caída del mismo, se consideraron un resultado directo de las condiciones estresantes de sitio y manejo al que se somete el arbolado (Cibrián et al, 2000;Cibrián et al, 2007;Chacalo y Corona, 2009;Loh et al, 2003;Koeser et al , 2013;Tovar, 2007). A pesar de la presencia crónica de estos factores estresantes, el arbolado con al menos 50 % de la copa viva (percentil 50); con valores de la variable dnc entre 40 y 60 % se considera suficiente para sobrevivir en condiciones urbanas y un buen estado general de salud.…”
Section: Crown Conditionunclassified
“…Los valores de trpf indicaron que en las alamedas existen árboles con suficiente follaje en las copas para realizar funciones de fotosíntesis y respiración, pero que no son lo suficientemente densas para For example, prunings (shape and cleaning), that not only are performed in the right way; the shape and size of leaves and the management from the visitors al l together helped to modify the natural shapes of the crowns. The persistent plagues such as the sucking insect Stenomacra marginel la Herrich-Schaeffer, and the diseases of the foliage promote their shedding and they were taken as a direct result of the stressing conditions of the site and management to which the trees are subjected (Cibrián et al, 2000;Cibrián et al, 2007;Chacalo and Corona, 2009;Loh et al, 2003;Koeser et al, 2013;Tovar, 2007). In spite of the chronic presence of these stressing factors, the trees with at least 50 % of the live crown (50 percentile); with values of the dnc variable within the 40 -60 % range is considered as satisfactory to survive under urban conditions and in good health in general.…”
Section: Crown Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%