1976
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1976.00021962006800050002x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Rate and Nutrient Uptake of Two Cotton Cultivars Grown Under Irrigation1

Abstract: The production of high cotton yield is highly dependent on adequate growth rate and nutrient uptake about which relatively little information is available under semiarid conditions. Growth rate and N, P, K uptake of two cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars, ‘Acala 1517‐C’ and ‘Acala 4‐42,’ which differ in their response to K fertilizer, were investigated in an irrigated field (soil type ‐ Typic Rhodoxeralf) under favorable conditions conducive to high yields. The rate of dry matter production was slow unt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
70
4
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
15
70
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…deve- loping bolls). In previous works, variation in K uptake among cotton cultivars has been found (Halevy, 1976;Brouder and Cassman, 1990;López et al, 2008b) which probably reflects variation in root K uptake as well as differential demand for growth (Keino et al, 1999;López et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…deve- loping bolls). In previous works, variation in K uptake among cotton cultivars has been found (Halevy, 1976;Brouder and Cassman, 1990;López et al, 2008b) which probably reflects variation in root K uptake as well as differential demand for growth (Keino et al, 1999;López et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, the results of PL effects on cotton leaf and stem N concentration may be largely impacting the meta-analysis results for plant leaf and stem N concentration. Several studies observed that only 42 to 65 % of the PL N is removed from the field in harvested cotton (Halevy, 1976;Mullins and Burmester, 1990;Tewolde et al, 2007), thus, lead to a lower cotton leaf or stem N concentration compared to inorganic N fertilizer with the same N application rate.…”
Section: Nutrient Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dose de N requerida para proporcionar a máxima produtividade biológica não variou em populações da ordem de 128 para 256 mil plantas ha -1 (boquet, 2005), indicando que a quantidade absorvida não muda com o aumento da densidade populacional, como foi observado neste trabalho, embora a época de exigência tenha sido alterada (figura 2a e Quadro 2). para a produção de uma tonelada de algodão em fibra, Halevy (1976) observou que a exportação de nutrientes foi, em média, de 60 kg de N, 11 kg de p e 26,5 kg de K -quantidades essas inferiores às observadas no presente trabalho (média de 91, 18,8 e 60 kg ha -1 de N, p e K, respectivamente). uma possível explicação seria que as variedades mais modernas, oriundas de genótipos importados, mostram-se mais sensíveis à deficiência de nutrientes, especialmente o K, e isso pode ocorrer por terem capacidade inferior de absorção de nutrientes do solo (rosolem, 2001), podendo haver diferenças entre cultivares da ordem de 40, 43 e 21 % na quantidade requerida de N, p e K, respectivamente, para produzir a mesma quantidade de algodão em fibra (unruh & silvertooh, 1996).…”
Section: Nitrogênio Acumulado Na Planta (A) No Caule (B) Nas Folhunclassified