2005
DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6193-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, Poverty, and Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic crises of differing levels across these countries had consequences for both postponement decisions and quantum fertility levels (Myrskylä et al 2013; Sobotka 2003). Exploratory analyses of our data suggest that regions with varying income levels were not substantially different in their initial fertility reaction to the crisis, but that high developed areas seemed to have generally recovered more quickly (see also Alam et al 2005 and Macours and Swinnen 2008). These uneven recoveries from the transition shock might appear as the emergence of a positive relationship, even though they are likely “noise” of a distortion due to the post-communist crisis.…”
Section: Development Economic Centres and Peripheries And Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The economic crises of differing levels across these countries had consequences for both postponement decisions and quantum fertility levels (Myrskylä et al 2013; Sobotka 2003). Exploratory analyses of our data suggest that regions with varying income levels were not substantially different in their initial fertility reaction to the crisis, but that high developed areas seemed to have generally recovered more quickly (see also Alam et al 2005 and Macours and Swinnen 2008). These uneven recoveries from the transition shock might appear as the emergence of a positive relationship, even though they are likely “noise” of a distortion due to the post-communist crisis.…”
Section: Development Economic Centres and Peripheries And Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Research on welfare in the region has included studies of the politics of social policy (Cook, 2007;Cox, 2007;Cox and Gallai, 2012;Offe, 1993;Orenstein, 2008;Potůček, 2008), changing pensions policies (Fultz, 2002;Orenstein, 2008;Szalai, 2004), the influence of international organisations on welfare policies in the region (Deacon and Hulse 1997;Orenstein and Haas 2005), welfare assistance (Braithwaite et al, 2000;Nelson, 2010;Ringold and Kasek, 2007), and empirical studies of the INTERSECTIONS. EAST EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND POLITICS, 4 (1): 24-44. consequences of changing welfare provision for the poverty, income inequality and security of different social groups (Dudwick et al, 2005;EBRD, 2011;Emigh and Szelényi, 2001;Smith et al, 2008;Swain, 2011;Szalai, 2006). Further studies have focused on the forces shaping the emergence of post-socialist welfare provision in terms of long-term historical legacies (Cerami and Vanhuysee, 2009;Inglot, 2008) and the immediate political needs of post-socialist ruling political elites in managing the high costs of the economic transition, reducing welfare spending and dividing and pacifying competing social groups (Vanhuysse, 2006;Bohle and Greskovits, 2012).…”
Section: The Welfare Regime Debate and Central And Eastern Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very few studies were conducted in selected countries within Eastern Europe (Rabusic and Sirovatka, 1999; van Oorschot, 2006), while the less developed countries of Central Asia, the Caucasus, and most of the Balkans have only received cursory attention. However, these less developed countries initially experienced higher levels of poverty and less effective social welfare programs – problems that were further exacerbated during the transitions that followed the communist period (Alam et al , 2005; Habibov and Fan, 2007; Habibov, 2012). As the governments of these countries examine ways to strengthen their social welfare systems, there is the need for policy-makers and social administrators to better understand preferences with respect to perceptions of deservingness, and the factors influencing them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%