2019
DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2019.1694137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth performance, carcass traits and digestive function of broiler chickens fed diets with graded levels of corn resistant starch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that the dressing percentage of the meat-type crossbred broiler and two breeds of yellow-feathered chicken in the current study was lower than that reported for Arbor Acres broilers [27]. However, the dressing percentage was higher in Mahuang chickens of 75 days as well as in Tuer chickens of 60 days and 75 days than in meattype crossbred broilers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…We observed that the dressing percentage of the meat-type crossbred broiler and two breeds of yellow-feathered chicken in the current study was lower than that reported for Arbor Acres broilers [27]. However, the dressing percentage was higher in Mahuang chickens of 75 days as well as in Tuer chickens of 60 days and 75 days than in meattype crossbred broilers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Gross energy (GE) was measured with a calorimeter (C3000, IKA-WERKE Co., Ltd., Staufen, Germany). The AME (MJ/kg) was calculated according to the formula provided by Liu et al (2020) [ 38 ] and Karunaratne et al (2018) [ 39 ]. The following equations were used to calculate apparent nutrient digestibility and AME: Apparent nutrient digestibility (%) = 100 − [(TiO 2 in diet/TiO 2 in excreta or ileum digesta) × (Nutrient in excreta or ileum digesta/nutrient in diet)] × 100 AME (MJ/kg diet) = [Feed intake × GE in diet] − (Excreta output × GE in excreta)]/Feed intake …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El hígado de los tratamientos 80MA y 100MA fueron más grandes que el de las aves de los otros tratamientos, posiblemente debido al mayor trabajo hepático que tuvieron, porque el tejido adiposo de las aves sirve solo como un sitio de almacenamiento de grasa, y es en el hígado donde principalmente se sintetiza la grasa (Zhang et al, 2020). El tamaño de molleja no se vio afectado por las diferentes dietas, posiblemente debido a que todas tuvieron similar granulometría y el tamaño de partícula del maíz fue de 5 mm en todas las dietas.…”
Section: Pesos Relativos De Carcasa Grasa Abdominal Y óRganosunclassified