1999
DOI: 10.1136/adc.81.5.395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth patterns of breast fed and formula fed infants in the first 12 months of life: an Italian study

Abstract: Aim-To compare the growth patterns of breast fed and formula fed Italian infants in the first 12 months of life using World Health Organisation (WHO) reference data. Methods-The growth patterns of 73 breast fed infants (36 male, 37 female) and 65 formula fed infants (35 male, 30 female) were compared. Solid foods were introduced with the same weaning schedules from the 5th month in both groups. The weight for age (WA), length for age (LA), and weight for length (WL) z scores (National Center for Health Statist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
74
2
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
15
74
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The present investigation was out of the scope of the study and aimed to describe infants feeding practices during the first year of life in a subsample of the cohort, and their relationship on anthropometric measures at 1-y. Differently to what described in literature by Agostoni and Koletzko, in 1999 and 2009 respectively, we did not find significant differences between the pattern of growth of breast-fed and formula-fed infants [10,11]. In our cohort, we found no association between infants' anthropometrics at 1 year and BF duration, while FF duration was found to be positively associated to length at 1 year.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present investigation was out of the scope of the study and aimed to describe infants feeding practices during the first year of life in a subsample of the cohort, and their relationship on anthropometric measures at 1-y. Differently to what described in literature by Agostoni and Koletzko, in 1999 and 2009 respectively, we did not find significant differences between the pattern of growth of breast-fed and formula-fed infants [10,11]. In our cohort, we found no association between infants' anthropometrics at 1 year and BF duration, while FF duration was found to be positively associated to length at 1 year.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…The most widely accepted explanation of the protective effect of BF is the difference in child growth rate of breast vs. formula-fed infants [8,9]. As demonstrated by a longitudinal multicenter Randomized Control Trial [10] and by a national cohort study [11], breast-fed infants grow differently than formula-fed infants, with the latter having a higher weight and weight-for-length at 1-y of age. Although BF, conversely to FF, is associated with a slightly lower BMI in childhood and adulthood, a precise assessment of the preventive role of BF is difficult to perform because of the many confounding factors [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full-term infants were measured at birth (third day of life), and at 1 and 3 mo of age. Body weight, length, and head circumference were measured according to standard procedures (20).The weight of each baby was measured on an electronic scale accurate to ±0.1 g (PEA POD Infant Body Composition System; Cosmed, Concord, CA). Body length was measured to the nearest 1 mm on a Harpenden neonatometer (Holtain, Crymych, UK).…”
Section: Growth and Body Composition Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breastfed infants generally grow slower and are leaner than formula-fed infants (Dewey et al, 1992(Dewey et al, , 1995Heinig et al, 1993;Michaelsen et al, 1994;Nielsen et al, 1998;Agostoni et al, 1999). The difference may be explained by the difference in protein content between breast milk and IF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%