2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of three microalgae strains and nutrient removal from an agro-zootechnical digestate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
3
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(19 reference statements)
6
64
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has recently been characterized from a chemical and ecotoxicological point of view (Tigini et al, 2016 Chlorella vulgaris CCAP 211/11b (Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa, Argyll, UK) was selected for this study in view of our previous experiences with digestates (Franchino et al, 2013). Firstly, C. vulgaris was pre-grown in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of Removal efficiency (RE) was estimated by dividing the difference between the initial nutrient concentration and that on day n (Ci-Cn) by Ci, and then multiplied by 100, while the Elimination Capacity (EC) by dividing the difference between the nutrient concentration of two subsequent samples (Cn-1 and Cn) by the time elapsed between them.…”
Section: Microalgae Growth and Nutrient Removal In Diluted Digestatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has recently been characterized from a chemical and ecotoxicological point of view (Tigini et al, 2016 Chlorella vulgaris CCAP 211/11b (Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa, Argyll, UK) was selected for this study in view of our previous experiences with digestates (Franchino et al, 2013). Firstly, C. vulgaris was pre-grown in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of Removal efficiency (RE) was estimated by dividing the difference between the initial nutrient concentration and that on day n (Ci-Cn) by Ci, and then multiplied by 100, while the Elimination Capacity (EC) by dividing the difference between the nutrient concentration of two subsequent samples (Cn-1 and Cn) by the time elapsed between them.…”
Section: Microalgae Growth and Nutrient Removal In Diluted Digestatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, the green alga Chlorella vulgaris has shown a good potential for nutrient removal from various types of digestate: dairy manure (Wang et al 2010); cattle slurry and raw cheese whey (Franchino et al, 2013); municipal WWTP (Cho et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentials of the microalgae cultivated in municipal wastewater effluent in batch and continuous mode have been reviewed. Many previous studies have reported the treatment of industrial, municipal and agricultural wastewater by micro algal culture systems (Franchino et al, 2013;Ji et al, 2013;Lau et al, 1995;Lau et al, 1998;McGinn et al, 2012;Singh et al, 2012;Srinivasan & Subramaniam, 2009;Talbot & delaNoue, 1993;Tam & Wong, 1989;Williams, 2003). Such type of schemes has significant applications in the reduction of nutrient release in associated streams by assimilatory uptake of nitrogen that in turn decreases the rate of eutrophication of receiving streams and also provides oxygen for nitrification and biological organic matter oxidation (Kothari et al, 2013;Mata et al, 2010;Park et al, 2010;Wolanski et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from wastewater seems to be a promising option (Ali et al 2013;Franchino et al 2013;Richards and Mullins 2013;Sood et al 2012). Oswald and Gotaas (1955) are the pioneers in this area, especially in terms of illustrating the potential of algae in the wastewater treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%