2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.10.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of thin rubrene single crystals from 1-propanol solvent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of this complication, the elucidation of charge transport efficacy between polymorphs has largely been limited to comparisons of transistor mobilities in which polymorphic single crystals are specifically oriented with π‐stacking in the direction of intended charge transport. In this context, single‐crystal transistors of orthorhombic rubrene exhibit device mobilities that are an order of magnitude higher along [010] than those of triclinic rubrene along [100] . Devices comprising β‐crystals of dihexyl‐substituted dibenzo[d,d′[thieno[3,2‐b;4,5‐b′]dithiophenes, C6‐DBTBT, exhibit mobilities that are twice as high as those comprising its α‐crystals, with this difference in mobility attributed to a decrease in the effective mass along the b ‐axis of the β‐crystals compared to the a ‐axis of the α‐crystals .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this complication, the elucidation of charge transport efficacy between polymorphs has largely been limited to comparisons of transistor mobilities in which polymorphic single crystals are specifically oriented with π‐stacking in the direction of intended charge transport. In this context, single‐crystal transistors of orthorhombic rubrene exhibit device mobilities that are an order of magnitude higher along [010] than those of triclinic rubrene along [100] . Devices comprising β‐crystals of dihexyl‐substituted dibenzo[d,d′[thieno[3,2‐b;4,5‐b′]dithiophenes, C6‐DBTBT, exhibit mobilities that are twice as high as those comprising its α‐crystals, with this difference in mobility attributed to a decrease in the effective mass along the b ‐axis of the β‐crystals compared to the a ‐axis of the α‐crystals .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymorphism offers an opportunity to tailor the molecular packing of a material, without affecting its chemical components. For example, rubrene can crystallize into three crystalline polymorphs, including an orthorhombic, a triclinic, and a monoclinic phase (Figure 1a) [28][29][30]. Taking advantage of polymorphism, it is possible to fabricate OFETs from the same organic semiconductor but with different polymorphs, hence, with different properties (Figure 1b).…”
Section: The Role Of Polymorphism In Ofetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, by measuring charge transport performance in OFETs from different polymorphs, a direct relationship between molecular packing and charge transport can be established. Thus, many investigations on charge transport in different polymorphs have been performed in thin-film transistors, including some benchmark organic semiconductors like pentacene derivatives [15,31,32], rubrene [28][29][30], sexithiophene (6T) [33][34][35][36], and [1]benzothieno [3,2-b] [1]benzothiophene (BTBT) derivatives [10,37,38]. However, the different factors affecting the device performance, including crystallinity, grain size, and grain boundaries, are difficult to be eliminated in thin-film transistors.…”
Section: The Role Of Polymorphism In Ofetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single crystals, orthorhombic from, grown using the solution slow cooling technique exhibited high hole mobilities of up to 1.6 cm 2 /(V s), while monoclinic form, showed lower carrier mobili ties of 0.1 cm 2 /(V s) [38].…”
Section: Rubrene and Its Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%