2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of polyaniline on rGO-Co3S4 nanocomposite for high-performance supercapacitor energy storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is evident from TGA analysis, the overall weight loss of CQDs/CoS 2 nanocomposites is more than the CoS 2 inorganic material. The general TGA behaviors of CoS 2 and CQDs/CoS 2 nanocomposite are quite similar, with the only difference being the loss of CQD organic groups (3.5% of the total mass of the nanocomposite) added to the nanocomposite at temperatures beyond 170 °C. , To estimate the active surface area and porosity of the composite, the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of the CQDs/CoS 2 nanocomposite were obtained. A type IV isotherm with a hysteresis loop (Figure b) proves the mesoporous nature of the material, which was further confirmed by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution graph, as shown in the inset of Figure b.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is evident from TGA analysis, the overall weight loss of CQDs/CoS 2 nanocomposites is more than the CoS 2 inorganic material. The general TGA behaviors of CoS 2 and CQDs/CoS 2 nanocomposite are quite similar, with the only difference being the loss of CQD organic groups (3.5% of the total mass of the nanocomposite) added to the nanocomposite at temperatures beyond 170 °C. , To estimate the active surface area and porosity of the composite, the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of the CQDs/CoS 2 nanocomposite were obtained. A type IV isotherm with a hysteresis loop (Figure b) proves the mesoporous nature of the material, which was further confirmed by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution graph, as shown in the inset of Figure b.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the application of such materials is limited by the poor electrical conductivity and mechanical stability of cobalt sulfide [24] . To solve this problem, Trabizi et al [25] . combined it with reduced graphene oxide using an one‐pot hydrothermal method to get the rGO‐cobalt sulfide (rGO−Co 3 S 4 ) nanocomposite.…”
Section: Monometallic Sulfides In Core@shell Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6A shows the scheme of the fabrication process and TEM images of the components (Figure 6B–6D). In fact, it can be observed that the rGO with Co 3 S 4 nanoparticles anchored on the surface acts as a substrate for deposition of PANI nanostructures [25] …”
Section: Monometallic Sulfides In Core@shell Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, cobalt sulfide (CoxSy) has an excellent electrical conductivity and abundant redox reaction sites. It is regarded as one of the suitable candidates for electrode material, however, it is often suffered from poor performance during long-term charge/discharge processes 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%