2000
DOI: 10.1648/0273-8570-71.4.676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of Late-Hatched, Competitively Disadvantaged Nestling House Wrens Relative to Their Older, Larger Nestmates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Blue Tits, the period of weight increase was longer for nestlings growing up in enlarged broods, while there was no difference to reduced broods in the period of tarsus growth (Kunz and Ekman 2000), and similar results were obtained in Carrion Crows (Corvus corone corone) when nestling growth rates were depressed by limiting food supplies (Richner et al 1989). Lago et al (2000) showed that in asynchronously hatching broods of House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon), the rates of mass gain and tarsus growth were reduced in late-hatched, competitively disadvantaged nestlings (as compared to their first-hatched, larger nestmates), while rates of feather growth were almost normal, allowing nest-leaving simultaneously with their siblings. Also in European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), slowly growing nestlings gave priority to wing growth (Smith and Wettermark 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In Blue Tits, the period of weight increase was longer for nestlings growing up in enlarged broods, while there was no difference to reduced broods in the period of tarsus growth (Kunz and Ekman 2000), and similar results were obtained in Carrion Crows (Corvus corone corone) when nestling growth rates were depressed by limiting food supplies (Richner et al 1989). Lago et al (2000) showed that in asynchronously hatching broods of House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon), the rates of mass gain and tarsus growth were reduced in late-hatched, competitively disadvantaged nestlings (as compared to their first-hatched, larger nestmates), while rates of feather growth were almost normal, allowing nest-leaving simultaneously with their siblings. Also in European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), slowly growing nestlings gave priority to wing growth (Smith and Wettermark 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…By the time the entire clutch has hatched, it is not uncommon in some species for the first-hatched chick to be twice as heavy as the last-hatched chick (Zach 1982;Krebs 1999). The ensuing mass hierarchies have been demonstrated to disadvantage late-hatched nestlings and affect their prefledging performance (Lago et al 2000). This has important fitness implications, since a nestling's mass just prior to leaving the nest is a strong predictor of postfledging survival in several species (Magrath 1991;Monros et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, it has been suggested that the contribution of asynchronously hatched chicks per se to fitness of their parents is marginal under poor food conditions, since they will be sacrificed in favour of the larger nestmates (reviewed in Amundsen and Slagsvold 1998). Indeed, several studies of different passerine species have found that last-hatched eggs often produce undersized individuals that have low chances of survival (e.g., Nilsson and Svensson, 1996;Lago and Johnson, 2000). This can thus be regarded as a cost of the asynchronous hatching strategy.…”
Section: Hidden Benefits Of Hatching Asynchrony?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially different-sized (different-aged) individuals with similar genotypes have different competitive abilities that leads to an unequal distribution of food among siblings, where the lower a sibling's position in the hierarchy, the smaller its share of parental investment (Nilsson and Ga˚rdmark, 2001). A later-hatched nestling is initially smaller than its earlier-hatched siblings, it is disadvantaged in food competition, and, as a consequence, its growth pattern is strongly influenced by the growth of its larger siblings (Lago and Johnson, 2000;Nilsson and Ga˚rdmark, 2001). Hence, there should be stronger selection for growth rate on last-hatched nestlings compared with earlier-hatched, average-sized nestlings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation