2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0024070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of high-quality one-inch free-standing heteroepitaxial (001) diamond on (112¯0) sapphire substrate

Abstract: One-inch free-standing (001) diamond layers on a (112¯0) (a-plane) sapphire substrate with an Ir buffer layer (Kenzan Diamond®) were grown. The full-width at half maximum values of (004) and (311) x-ray rocking curves were 113.4 and 234.0 arc sec, respectively. The dislocation density of the substrates was 1.4 × 107 cm−2, determined by plan-view transmission electron microscopy observation. These values are much lower than the reported values among heteroepitaxial diamonds. Furthermore, x-ray pole figure measu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest single-crystal diamond substrate has been reported to have a diameter of ~3.5-inches based on Ir/YSZ/Si [8]. ® Other groups have reported 2-inch-scale substrates labs also using Ir hetereoepitaxy [9,10]. However, the crystalline quality is still worse than that of HPHT (commonly dislocation density of 10 7 to 10 9 cm −2 in heteroepitaxy growth) [11][12][13].…”
Section: Diamond Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest single-crystal diamond substrate has been reported to have a diameter of ~3.5-inches based on Ir/YSZ/Si [8]. ® Other groups have reported 2-inch-scale substrates labs also using Ir hetereoepitaxy [9,10]. However, the crystalline quality is still worse than that of HPHT (commonly dislocation density of 10 7 to 10 9 cm −2 in heteroepitaxy growth) [11][12][13].…”
Section: Diamond Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With Au stripe masks on the diamond surface, the stress decreased significantly, and the dislocation density was below 10 8 cm −2 [22]. Kim et al fabricated a one-inch free-standing heteroepitaxial (001) diamond with a dislocation density of 1.4 × 10 7 cm −2 [23]. Mehmel et al used micrometric laser-pierced hole arrays to reduce dislocation densities [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dislocations [11][12][13][14] and stress [15,16] in diamond films are still a major issue in developing large and high-quality diamonds. In order to improve these phenomena, several techniques have been used [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The remarkable functional properties of diamonds depend not only on their physical and chemical properties but also on their surface morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%