1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9016-7_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of dark chub, Zacco temmincki (Cyprinidae), with a discussion of sexual size differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stearns (1992) suggested that sexual selection strongly favors larger male size in polygynous mammals, whereas fecundity selection favors larger females in fishes, because fish fecundity increased isometrically with body weight. However, male-biased body sizes have been reported in some fish species that show intense competition between males for females (Beacham and Murray 1985;Blair et al 1993;Katano 1998;Quinn et al 2001). In addition, patterns of sexual size dimorphism sometimes vary among populations within fish species, and the variation in the relative strengths of sexualselection and fecundity-selection would produce the observed sexual size dimorphism pattern (Holtby and Healey 1990;Tamate and Maekawa 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Stearns (1992) suggested that sexual selection strongly favors larger male size in polygynous mammals, whereas fecundity selection favors larger females in fishes, because fish fecundity increased isometrically with body weight. However, male-biased body sizes have been reported in some fish species that show intense competition between males for females (Beacham and Murray 1985;Blair et al 1993;Katano 1998;Quinn et al 2001). In addition, patterns of sexual size dimorphism sometimes vary among populations within fish species, and the variation in the relative strengths of sexualselection and fecundity-selection would produce the observed sexual size dimorphism pattern (Holtby and Healey 1990;Tamate and Maekawa 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, newly hatched larvae of C. sieboldii are smaller than those of C. temminckii. At our study site, however, growth rates of C. sieboldii after hatching were higher than that of C. temminckii observed by Katano (1998). Katano (1998) also suggested that the growth rates of C. temminckii were highest from April to May, and those of males Figure 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…At our study site, however, growth rates of C. sieboldii after hatching were higher than that of C. temminckii observed by Katano (1998). Katano (1998) also suggested that the growth rates of C. temminckii were highest from April to May, and those of males Figure 6. Total numbers and 95% confidence intervals for Candidia sieboldii on each sampling date, as estimated by using the Jolly-Seber method (top), and percentage recapture rates (bottom) in section 2 of the Hodoji River, Japan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Further, from the fi gure in Marconato and Rasotto (1989), growth rates in size from May to July (the breeding season) can be perceived to be smaller than those from July to September (after the breeding season). Males of both the Japanese fl uvial sculpin Cottus pollux (see Natsumeda et al, 1997) and the dark chub Zacco temmincki (see Katano, 1998), which show male-biased SSD and whose male mating success depends on the body size, were reported to grow even in the breeding season. In the present study, Lefua sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S exual size dimorphism (SSD) has been recognized in many fi shes (Echeverria, 1986;Natsumeda et al, 1997;Katano, 1998;Kohda et al, 2002;Henderson et al, 2003). Male-biased SSD has been ultimately explained mainly as sexual selection for males (male-male interference competition and female choice) (Natsumeda et al, 1997;Katano, 1998) and female-biased SSD mainly as natural selection for females (Echeverria, 1986). Reproductive roles to gain reproductive success for individuals are different between sexes, i.e., maximization of mate acquisition for males and maximization of offspring production for females (Trivers, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%