Growth of Creative Capital and Human Perspectives under the Conditions of Globalisation

Abstract

Growth of creative capital and ever-burgeoning interest in the creativity phenomenon appear to have been facing intimidation with new threats emerging in connection with them – the unpredictability whereof is increasing under conditions of globalisation. The purpose of this study is to analyse the possible negative consequences of human creativity, globalisation and technological development. This perspective is developed using methods of comparative theoretical and methodological analysis, methods of theoretical reconstruction of basic strategies of the creative capital formation, modelling and extrapolation methods.
 The issues of essence, nature, creativity and creative capital should be discussed in connection with solving social problems and studying of perspectives of human development. This is important because the human creation and creative activity can lead both to constructive and destructive processes, such as Human Development and Human disappearing from the history scene due to their own creativity.
 The proposed perspective substantiates the necessity of deepened theoretical-philosophic analysis of creativity and growth of creative capital in connection with the emerging threats of the human development— discloses new aspects of the topic under discussion, which did not receive sufficient coverage in the scientific literature. Conclusions of the study possess a practical meaning for substantiating the development strategies in various fields of social practice and education in terms of globalisation.
 

Changes in the Understanding of Religious and Cultural Components of Human Capital

“…For this reason, the notion of human capital is supplemented with more and more new components based on new experience and skills of workers associated with a greater degree of social freedom, freedom of movement, access to information and an increase in the speed of learning, the spread of digital literacy, increased flexibility of thinking and mastering of several professions. (Andryukhina et al, 2020). Initially, the Theory of Human Capital implied that two factors, the marginal productivity of labor and earnings, drove investment in education (Marginson, 2019).…”