1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00114-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of and competition between Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with Sundermann and Estridges (1999) who showed that the T. gondii RH strain multiplies faster than the N. caninum NC-1 strain in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in agreement with Sundermann and Estridges (1999) who showed that the T. gondii RH strain multiplies faster than the N. caninum NC-1 strain in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results were similar to the results previously obtained for the Nc-1 isolate, which displayed a lag period of 10-12 h and a Td of 14-15 h using human foreskin fibroblasts [40]. However, we must consider, as we did for the IRs, that the proliferation kinetics may have been influenced by the host cell lines used in these assays [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast to our data, Sundermann and Estridge (1999) compared invasion by RH and NC-1 isolates to human foreskin fibroblasts and found that 2 to 3-fold more NC-1 tachyzoites were intracellular compared with RH at 1 or 3 h p.i. One possible explanation for the difference between our results and theirs, is that T. gondii can display different growth dynamics depending on the type of cultured cell used (Hughes, Hudson and Fleck, 1986).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%