Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1972
DOI: 10.1149/1.2404169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Mechanism for Germanium Deposition near a SiO[sub 2]-Ge Boundary

Abstract: Enhanced growth (ridge growth) of germanium on germanium near an oxide-germanium boundary has been studied in the Ge-H-CI system as a function of temperature and oxide pad width. A model is presented assuming that surface diffusion of some germanium-containing species occurs along the SiO2 pads, thereby feeding additional material to the germanium at the pad edge to form the ridge. It is shown that volume diffusion effects alone cannot explain the data. It appears that the reaction at the oxide-germanium bound… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand more completely the growth dynamics in SAG, several growth models have been proposed by different groups [12,14,[67][68][69][70][71]. The dynamics involved in these epitaxial processes can be well described under many conditions by the mass transport limited model.…”
Section: Growth Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand more completely the growth dynamics in SAG, several growth models have been proposed by different groups [12,14,[67][68][69][70][71]. The dynamics involved in these epitaxial processes can be well described under many conditions by the mass transport limited model.…”
Section: Growth Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropic growth behaviour in these directions was explained qualitatively earlier by considering the difference in bonding configurations 12) and change of dangling bonds in these two directions. 13) Here, based on a treatment by Silvestri et al 14) for Ge migration on SiO 2 pads we quantify the energy term 1/2 [E d − E m ] (where E d and E m are the desorption energy and activation energy of surface migration, respectively) for two principal axes namely [110] and [110]. Actually this term is different for different directions and hence causes the anisotropy in the surface migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%