2005
DOI: 10.1071/ar04019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, ion content, gas exchange, and water relations of wheat genotypes differing in salt tolerances

Abstract: Although the mechanisms of salt tolerance in plants have received much attention for many years, genotypic differences influencing salt tolerance still remain uncertain. To investigate the key physiological factors associated with genotypic differences in salt tolerance of wheat and their relationship to salt stress, 13 wheat genotypes from Egypt, Australia, India, and Germany, that differ in their salt tolerances, were grown in a greenhouse in soils of 4 different salinity levels (control, 50, 100, and 150 mm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
82
2
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
82
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, maintenance of higher K and Ca concentrations in the salt-tolerant genotypes has been shown to be one of the mechanisms underlying their superior salt tolerance (El-Hendawy et al 2005). However, in the present study, cereals had a significantly lower concentration of Ca in the YML than chickpea.…”
Section: Effect Of Subsoil Constraints On Nutrient Concentrationcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Therefore, maintenance of higher K and Ca concentrations in the salt-tolerant genotypes has been shown to be one of the mechanisms underlying their superior salt tolerance (El-Hendawy et al 2005). However, in the present study, cereals had a significantly lower concentration of Ca in the YML than chickpea.…”
Section: Effect Of Subsoil Constraints On Nutrient Concentrationcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Similar results were reported for tomato (Lapina and Popov 1970), pea (Hamada and El-Enany 1994), alfalfa (Winicov and Seemann 1990), sunflower (Ashraf 1999), sorghum (Netondo et al 2004), and wheat (El-Hendawy et al 2005). Differences in CCI among cultivars (Table 1, Figure 1) indicate that this trait can be also influenced by genetic constitution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Measurements of LAI and CT both provide indirect indicators for various morphophysiological traits such as the water status of plants, the capacity of roots to access available soil water, and the main limitations of photosynthesis, growth, and production under water shortage conditions (El-Hendawy et al, 2005;Pask and Reynolds, 2013). Therefore, both parameters could be used to detect destructively ascertained morphophysiological traits in a rapid, low-cost, and nondestructive manner (Jin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ca. 20-30 samples per hour using a Scholander pressure chamber) (Jongdee et al, 2002;El-Hendawy et al, 2005;Munjal and Dhanda, 2005;Gutierrez et al, 2010). Thus, the main goal of recent innovative breeding strategies is to look for easy, rapid, inexpensive, and nondestructive tools to assess agronomic and physiological traits of a large number of germplasms in a relative short time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%