1976
DOI: 10.2307/2484835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Forms of Opuntia compressa (Cactaceae) in Florida Sandridge Habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suspect that this reduction is a consequence of the reduced light availability in scrub. Canopy coverage is nearly complete in scrub as a consequence of the dense overstory of Pinus clausa, which translates into scrub having the lowest available light of the associations studied (Abrahamson and Rubinstein 1976, Abrahamson et al 1984, Abrahamson 1995, 1999). Sandhill is intermediate in canopy coverage and hence light level, and scrubby flatwoods is the most open canopied of the three associations studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suspect that this reduction is a consequence of the reduced light availability in scrub. Canopy coverage is nearly complete in scrub as a consequence of the dense overstory of Pinus clausa, which translates into scrub having the lowest available light of the associations studied (Abrahamson and Rubinstein 1976, Abrahamson et al 1984, Abrahamson 1995, 1999). Sandhill is intermediate in canopy coverage and hence light level, and scrubby flatwoods is the most open canopied of the three associations studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quercus laevis of the southern Lake Wales Ridge express a stunted growth form, as they do not develop the heights and broad crowns of their more northerly counterparts. Multiple measurements of photosynthethically active radiation (PAR) in these associations showed that available PAR is highest in scrubby flatwoods, intermediate in sandhill, and lowest in sand pine scrub (Abrahamson and Rubinstein 1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scrubby flatwoods is the most open canopied of the three associations studied (Abrahamson and Rubinstein, 1976;Abrahamson et al, 1984;Abrahamson and Hartnett, 1990;Myers, 1990;Abrahamson, 1995Abrahamson, , 1999. Acorn production levels for oaks growing in sand pine scrub were consistently lower than levels in southern ridge sandhill or scrubby flatwoods.…”
Section: Influence Of Ramet Size and Vegetation Association Onmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The lower level of nut production by scrub hickory in scrub compared to sandhill or scrubby flatwoods is likely a consequence of the reduced light availability in scrub. Canopy coverage is nearly complete in scrub as a consequence of the dense sand pine overstory, which translates into scrub having the lowest available PAR of the associations studied (Abrahamson and Rubinstein, 1976;Abrahamson, 1999). This pattern of production across associations was parallel to that of acorn production by the oaks of these three associations (Abrahamson and Layne, 2002a).…”
Section: Nut Production In Relation To Ramet Size and Vegetation Assomentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The scrubby flatwoods site at the lowest elevation had the lowest minimum air and soil temperatures. Measurements of overstory canopy cover and photosynthethically active radiation (PAR) in these associations showed that available PAR is lowest in scrub (with the highest canopy cover), intermediate in sandhill (intermediate canopy cover), and highest in scrubby flatwoods (least canopy cover) (Abrahamson and Rubinstein, 1976;Abrahamson, 1999).…”
Section: Description Of Study Area-mentioning
confidence: 99%