2002
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.89.1.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation of ramet size to acorn production in five oak species of xeric upland habitats in south‐central Florida

Abstract: This study examined variation in two components of acorn production. Percentage of bearing ramets (stems) and number of acorns per bearing ramet were examined in five clonal oaks in three xeric habitats of south-central peninsular Florida in relation to ramet size within and between species and vegetative associations. Counts of acorns on two white oaks (Quercus chapmanii and Q. geminata) and three red oaks (Q. inopina, Q. laevis, and Q. myrtifolia) were conducted annually from 1969 to 1996 (except in 1991) on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend was exhibited by the five oak species that co-occur with scrub hickory (Abrahamson and Layne, 2002a), as well as in other oak species (e.g., Moody, 1953;Greenberg, 2000). A high correlation (r ϭ 0.84, P Ͻ 0.001) between ramet height and crown width in a random sample (N ϭ 269) of stems ranging from sprouts to mature scrub hickories from all associations suggests that the increase in nut production with size is due to increased canopy coverage rather than an increased number of nuts per unit area of canopy.…”
Section: Nut Production In Relation To Ramet Size and Vegetation Assosupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar trend was exhibited by the five oak species that co-occur with scrub hickory (Abrahamson and Layne, 2002a), as well as in other oak species (e.g., Moody, 1953;Greenberg, 2000). A high correlation (r ϭ 0.84, P Ͻ 0.001) between ramet height and crown width in a random sample (N ϭ 269) of stems ranging from sprouts to mature scrub hickories from all associations suggests that the increase in nut production with size is due to increased canopy coverage rather than an increased number of nuts per unit area of canopy.…”
Section: Nut Production In Relation To Ramet Size and Vegetation Assosupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Canopy coverage is nearly complete in scrub as a consequence of the dense sand pine overstory, which translates into scrub having the lowest available PAR of the associations studied (Abrahamson and Rubinstein, 1976;Abrahamson, 1999). This pattern of production across associations was parallel to that of acorn production by the oaks of these three associations (Abrahamson and Layne, 2002a). Coblentz (1980) also reported a similar trend of lower acorn production by Quercus garryana in closed canopy vs. open savannah.…”
Section: Nut Production In Relation To Ramet Size and Vegetation Assomentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Acorn production on four branches per tree was recorded each September, i.e. at the peak of seed production in holm oaks before acorns were ripe enough to fall or to be harvested in appreciable number by birds (see Abrahamson and Layne 2002). The total number of acorns produced per tree was estimated by multiplying the mean acorn production per branch by the number of branches per tree (see Espelta et al 2008 for further details).…”
Section: Acorn Crop Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since fecundity and acorn production are positively correlated with plant or crown 332 size [1,15], individuals are expected to differ greatly in their contribution to the next 333 generation in both male and female fertility. Additionally, the overlapping of crowns 334 of some old individuals (m3, m4, m5) among them and with an equal-size maple 335 (Acer monspessulanum), may restrict flower and fruit development due to space 336 competition or light limitation [1,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the overlapping of crowns 334 of some old individuals (m3, m4, m5) among them and with an equal-size maple 335 (Acer monspessulanum), may restrict flower and fruit development due to space 336 competition or light limitation [1,22]. In fact, it is remarkable that the large tree m5, 337 the closer to the maple (Figure 1 seed origin stand and the plantation is about 700 m).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%