2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2007.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth enhancing policy is the means to sustain the environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 For a survey of these issues see Baumol and Oates (1988), Nordhaus (1994), Nordhaus and Boyer (2000) and Xepapadeas (2005). 3 For an analysis of the design and the effects of these two policies see respectively Gradus and Smulders (1993), Smulders and Gradus (1996), Economides and Philippopoulos (2008) and Gupta and Barman (2009) for abatement policy and Pigou (1924), Baumol and Oates (1988), Mohtadi (1996) and Helfand et al (2003) for Pigouvian tax. Note that other possible instruments for public intervention in environmental economics, not analysed in this work, are property rights, binding quota restrictions and markets for pollution permits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 For a survey of these issues see Baumol and Oates (1988), Nordhaus (1994), Nordhaus and Boyer (2000) and Xepapadeas (2005). 3 For an analysis of the design and the effects of these two policies see respectively Gradus and Smulders (1993), Smulders and Gradus (1996), Economides and Philippopoulos (2008) and Gupta and Barman (2009) for abatement policy and Pigou (1924), Baumol and Oates (1988), Mohtadi (1996) and Helfand et al (2003) for Pigouvian tax. Note that other possible instruments for public intervention in environmental economics, not analysed in this work, are property rights, binding quota restrictions and markets for pollution permits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in this setting tax is a voluntary contribution, citizens always declare a positive fraction of their income, as we will verify below, because they care about their offsprings' education and environmental quality. Politicians 14 Given that public spending on abatement Π t−1 is financed by tax revenues which are collected from individuals' income derived from their human capital, as it will be explained below. 15 Since all agents have the same level of human capital we omit the subscript i = c, p from the level of human capital h t .…”
Section: Citizenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replacing the equilibrium values for (z * 3 , ϕ * 3 ) from equation (24) into equations. (13), (14) we obtain the following system of two autonomous non-linear first order difference equations…”
Section: Dynamic Behavior Of the System Of Difference Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, condition (15) reflects that giving up a unit of K P yields a benefit (from the discount rate and the avoided depreciation) as well as a loss equal to the value of the marginal productivity of produced capital; condition (16) tells a similar story except the loss is in the accumulation of human capital; condition (17) shows that, for each unit of K S that is relinquished, the value foregone includes the direct impact on utility, the value of the marginal productivity of social capital, its contribution to both human and social capital accumulation, and its benefits on environmental protection). Finally, condition (18) highlights the value of the natural capital stock to utility as well as its role in future regeneration.…”
Section: Optimal Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%