2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth differentiation factor 15 in pregnant women: A hero or villain?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change should make a real difference to subject lives, how long the effect remains, consumer acceptability, costeffectiveness, and ease of implementation. [12][13][14][15] Sung et al's 4 study seemed to have the aforementioned misinterpretation.…”
Section: Yeh Et Almentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The change should make a real difference to subject lives, how long the effect remains, consumer acceptability, costeffectiveness, and ease of implementation. [12][13][14][15] Sung et al's 4 study seemed to have the aforementioned misinterpretation.…”
Section: Yeh Et Almentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4 NICU administration rate seemed to be different between two groups, although statistically significant difference was also absent. 4 As emphasized by us before, 12–15 the statistical significance is only a really reflective of the findings of the study based on the reliability of the study results, but it may not be totally presentative of “the extent of change.” The change should make a real difference to subject lives, how long the effect remains, consumer acceptability, cost-effectiveness, and ease of implementation. 12–15 Sung et al’s 4 study seemed to have the aforementioned misinterpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The change should make a real difference to subject lives, how long the effect remain, consumer acceptability, costeffectiveness, and ease of implementation. [61][62][63] In fact, many clinical and pathological parameters were associated with worse prognosis of UCS. Some of them may be a bias inducing unpredicted results.…”
Section: Clinical-pathological Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since DM is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease and shares the similar pathophysiological disorders of many other chronic diseases or aging process, such as cancers, hereditary diseases, and many others, 4,7,8,10,[12][13][14][15][48][49][50][51] DM is associated with many morbidities. Morbidity from DM is mainly secondary to microvascular damage and dysfunction (hypertension, retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, diabetic foot, and nonalcoholic fatty liver), macrovascular injury and occlusion (hypertension, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), and acute complications of life-threatening diseases, including hyperglycemia (hyperglycemia hyperosmolar nonketotic coma and diabetic ketoacidosis) or hypoglycemia.…”
Section: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Morbidities Or Concomitant Como...mentioning
confidence: 99%