Growth curve analysis for body weight and dry matter intake in Friesian, Limousin x Friesian and Piemontese x Friesian cattle

Abstract

In this study, body weight and dry matter intake from birth to 460 days of age of Friesian (F), Limousin x Friesian (LixF) and Piemontese x Limousin (PixF) cattle fed individually under intensive feeding system were analyzed. Growth curve parameters of body weight and dry matter intake were investigated by using Gompertz model. No significant differences between genotypes were found in growth curve parameters for dry matter intake while there was significant genotype effect on integration constant, absolute weight gain at birth, degree of maturity at birth and absolute body weight gain from birth to 6 months of age for body weight. Mean values of growth parameters for body weight in F, LixF and PixF were: mature weight 744, 801 and 743 kg; integration constant 2.97, 3.02 and 2.81; maturity rate per day 0.0045, 0.0042 and 0.0047; age at inflection point 245, 270 and 227 days; weight of inflection point 274, 295 and 273, respectively. Body weight at birth for F, LixF and PixF were 38.6, 44.4 and 49.1. Absolute body weight gain from birth to 6 months of age for F, LixF and PixF were 24.8, 21.9 and 25.3. PixF exhibited higher maturity rate and reaching mature weights younger than F and LixF. Mature weight for body weight had positive phenotypic correlations with mature weight parameter for dry matter intake whereas there was a negative phenotypic correlation between mature weight for body weight and maturity rate for dry matter intake in all genotypes. The result shows that increasing intake is a result of body weight increased. On the other hand feed intake rate decreased as body weight increased. Considering the development period, from birth to 6 months of age, there was significant difference between genotypes for absolute body weigh gain and absolute dry matter intake whereas these parameters did not differ significantly between 6 and 16 months.

Comparison of growth performance and slaughter characteristics of Limousin and Charolais heifers

“…Contrary to the present results, however, lower feed intake capacity of LI compared to CH steers was reported (CHAMBAZ et al 2001), possibly due to a lower digestive tract weight of the LI. AKBAS et al (2006) explained the lower feed intake capacity of Limousin and Piemontese crossbred bulls as a result of their doublemuscle characterization. Due to markedly higher live weight gains, the CH heifers exhibited a lower feed conversion ratio (daily nutrient intake/daily live weight gain) than the LI animals (P<0.001) in the first experimental period and during the entire experiment.…”

Comparison on accuracy of different nonlinear models in predicting growth of Podolica bulls

“…Moreover, the maturity rate (k) obtained in our sample was considerably lower than that of Chianina breed (0.0022 vs. 0.103, respectively). Akbas et al () investigated the growth curve parameters in Friesian, Limousin × Friesian and Piemontese × Friesian young bulls using the Gompertz model. These animals showed a higher maturing rate (k) if compared with that obtained in our population using the same model, and they also reached the inflection point earlier.…”

Profile Analysis and Growth Curve for Body Mass Index of Broiler Chickens Reared Under Different Feed Restrictions in Early Age

“…Where, m number of days, n number of chickens, 2 S sum of square between regression coefficients for each groups and 1 S sum of square of deviation from regression for each groups (KOCABAŞ et al, 1997). Following linear model was used to compare groups for the growth curve parameters of body mass index (AKBAŞ et al, 2006). (3) Where ij Y =growth curve parameters for BMI, µ =overall mean, i α =fixed effect of the group (i=1, 2, 3), ij e =residual error distributed as N ( 2 σ 0, ) Nonlinear model (1) to estimate growth curve parameters and linear model (2) to identify group differences was fit using NCSS statistical package program (HINTZE, 2001).…”